Containing 5,418 Articles Spanning 370 Topics  
Ex-Mormon News, Stories And Recovery  
Online Since January 1, 2005  
PLEASE NOTE: If you have reached this page from an outside source such as an Internet Search or forum referral, please note that this page (the one you just landed on) is an archive containing articles on "MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2". This website, The Mormon Curtain - is a website that blogs the Ex-Mormon world. You can read The Mormon Curtain FAQ to understand the purpose of this website.
⇒  CLICK HERE to visit the main page of The Mormon Curtain.
  MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2
Total Articles: 21
Mitt Romney, Mormon Politician.
topic image
Romney's Religion - A Mormon President? No Way.
Thursday, Dec 21, 2006, at 11:06 AM
Original Author(s): Jacob Weisberg
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From SLATE:
The issue arises with Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's as-yet-undeclared bid for the 2008 Republican nomination. Romney would not be the first member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to run for the nation's highest office. He follows Orrin Hatch (2000); Mo Udall (1976); his father, George Romney (1968); and not least of all Joseph Smith, who ran in 1844 on a platform of "theodemocracy," abolition, and cutting congressional pay. Despite a strong showing in the Nauvoo straw poll, Smith didn't play much better nationally than Hatch did, and had to settle for the Mormon-elected post of King of the Kingdom of Heaven.

I wouldn't vote for someone who truly believed in the founding whoppers of Mormonism. The LDS church holds that Joseph Smith, directed by the angel Moroni, unearthed a book of golden plates buried in a hillside in Western New York in 1827. The plates were inscribed in "reformed" Egyptian hieroglyphics–a nonexistent version of the ancient language that had yet to be decoded. If you don't know the story, it's worth spending some time with Fawn Brodie's wonderful biography No Man Knows My History. Smith was able to dictate his "translation" of the Book of Mormon first by looking through diamond-encrusted decoder glasses and then by burying his face in a hat with a brown rock at the bottom of it. He was an obvious con man. Romney has every right to believe in con men, but I want to know if he does, and if so, I don't want him running the country.
http://www.slate.com/id/2155902/
topic image
Why Mitt Romney Can't Be The United States President
Thursday, Dec 28, 2006, at 07:34 AM
Original Author(s): Surviving In Utah
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
The main reason is, he has already sworn an oath of allegiance to the Mormon church above all else, which is in violation of the Oath of Office of the President of the United States of America.

How so? By being a temple worthy Mormon, he has sworn a secret temporal allegiance to the Mormon Church period!!

The Mormon Temple Law of Consecration (from the Mormon secret temple ceremony)

PETER: A couple will now come to the alter. (The Witness couple comes forward, and kneels at the altar (THE MORMON TEMPLE ALTER THAT IS (added by me)) as before.)

We are instructed to give unto you the Law of Consecration as contained in the book of Doctrine and Covenants (The Officiator picks up a copy of the Doctrine and Covenants (THE MORMON CHURCH RULES FOR RULING THE EARTH (added by me)) from the altar, and holds it up in view of all patrons.), in connection with the Law of the Gospel and the Law of Sacrifice which you have already received.

It is that you do consecrate yourselves, your time, talents and everything which the Lord (THE MORMON GOD (added by me)) has blessed you, or with which he may bless you, to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint (MORMON CHURCH (added by me)), for the building up of the Kingdom of (MORMON (added by me)) God on the earth and for the establishment of Zion (MORMON THEOCRACY (added by me)).

All arise. (All patrons stand.) Each of you bring your right arm to the square (secret Mormon demonstration of I will do it or have my life taken from me (added by me)).

You and each of you covenant and promise before (MORMON (added by me)) God, (Mormon (added by me)) angels, and these witnesses at this (Secret Mormon (added by me)) altar, that you do accept the Law of Consecration as contained in this, (The Officiator holds up a copy of the Doctrine and Covenants again.), the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, in that you do consecrate yourselves, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you, to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the building up of the Kingdom of God on the earth and for the establishment of Zion.

Each of you bow your head and say "yes."

Notice that the secret oath is to the Mormon church and not Mormon Jesus, a Mormon God or other entity.

That is the main difference of membership in any other church and the Mormon temple ceremony. YOU SWEAR ALLEGIANCE TO THE MORMON CHURCH, NOT TO A GOD.

Now, the Oath of Office of the President of the United State of America.

Each President recites the following oath, in accordance with Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

This statement is in conflict with the secret Mormon temple oath to give everything to the Mormon church. The MORMON Secret Oath is in conflict with the Constitution of the United States because Mormons hate Homosexuals, Lesbians, Blacks, Jews and other races and creeds. They control the conduct of its members and restrict their free agency. It is in conflict with the Presidential oath of office in that the Mormon oath demands that you obey and honor the Mormon church above all else in one's life.
topic image
Mormon For President: Romney Avoiding Temple Death Oath Talk - For Now
Friday, Feb 9, 2007, at 08:12 AM
Original Author(s): Deconstructor
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From the news wire:

"Mormon Candidate Braces for Religion as Issue"

"Mr. Romney said he was giving strong consideration to a public address about his faith and political views, modeled after the one John F. Kennedy gave in 1960 in the face of a wave of concern about his being a Roman Catholic."

"Mr. Romney’s aides said he had closely studied Kennedy’s speech in trying to measure how to navigate the task of becoming the nation’s first Mormon president, and he has consulted other Mormon elected leaders, including Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, about how to proceed."

"“There’s a lot of prejudice out there,” Mr. Hatch said. “We’ve come a long way, but there are still many people around the country who consider the Mormon faith a cult.”"

- http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/08/us/...

When they cite Mormon beliefs in these articles, the don't mention temple covenants. But they will.

At some point the press is going to refer to Mitt Romney's temple oaths of loyalty to the church.

ROMNEY'S MORMON TEMPLE OATH OF LOYALTY TO THE LDS CHURCH

TEMPLE NARRATOR: (All patrons stand.) "And as Jesus Christ has laid down his life for the redemption of mankind, so we should covenant to sacrifice all that we possess, even our own lives if necessary, in sustaining and defending the Kingdom of God."

"All arise. Each of you bring your right arm to the square. You and each of you solemnly covenant and promise before God, angels, and these witnesses at this alter that you will observe and keep the Law of Sacrifice, as contained in the Old and New Testament, as it has been explained to you. Each of you bow your head and say "yes.""

TEMPLE PATRONS: "Yes."

ELOHIM: "That will do." (All patrons sit down.)

TEMPLE NARRATOR: (All patrons stand.) "Each of you bring your right arm to the square. You and each of you covenant and promise before God, angels, and these witnesses at this altar, that you do accept the Law of Consecration as contained in this, (The Officiator holds up a copy of the Doctrine and Covenants again.), the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, in that you do consecrate yourselves, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you, to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the building up of the Kingdom of God on the earth and for the establishment of Zion."

Each of you bow your head and say "yes."

TEMPLE PATRONS: "Yes."

PETER: "That will do." (All patrons sit down.)

MORMON LEADERS EXPECT MEMBERS TO TAKE THIS OATH SERIOUSLY, EVEN ON POLITICAL MATTERS

See: http://www.i4m.com/think/leaders/morm...

MITT ROMNEY ALSO MADE DEATH OATHS IN THE TEMPLE

Romney made his Mormon temple covenants prior to 1990 when the gruesome death oaths were removed. So in Romney's case, he has made these death oaths to God:

Romney's Mormon Temple Death Oath #1:

ELOHIM: "All arise." (All patrons stand.)

ELOHIM: "Each of you make the sign of the First Token of the Aaronic Priesthood, by bringing your right arm to the square, the palm of the hand to the front, the fingers together, and the thumb extended. This is the sign. Now, repeat in your mind after me the words of the covenant, at the same time representing the execution of the penalty."

"I Mitt Romney, covenant before God, angels and these witnesses that I will never reveal the First Token of the Aaronic Priesthood, with its accompanying name and sign, and penalty. Rather than do so, I would suffer my life to be taken."

(Patrons perform the action as the Officiator guides them.)

"That will do." (Patrons sit down.)

Romney's Mormon Death Oath #2:

PETER: "The sign is made by bringing the right hand in front of you, with the hand in cupping shape, the right arm forming a square, and the left arm being raised to the square. This is the sign. (The officiator demonstrates.) The Execution of the Penalty is represented by placing the right hand on the left breast, drawing the hand quickly across the body, and dropping the hands to the sides. I will now explain the covenant and obligation of secrecy which are associated with this token, its name, and sign, and penalty, and which you will be required to take upon yourselves."

PETER: "All arise. (All Patrons stand.) Each of you make the sign of the Second Token of the Aaronic priesthood by bringing the right hand in front of you, with the hand in cupping shape, the right arm forming a square, and the left arm being raised to the square. This is the sign."

"Now, repeat in your mind after me the words of the covenant, at the same time representing the Executing of the Penalty."

"I, Mitt Romney, solemnly covenant, before God, angels, and these witnesses that I will never reveal the second Token of the Aaronic Priesthood, with its accompanying name, and sign, and penalty. Rather than do so, I would suffer my life to be taken."

(Patrons perform the action as the Officiator guides them.)

"That will do." (All patrons sit down.)

Romney's Mormon Temple Death Oath #3:

PETER: "All arise. (All patrons stand.) Each of you make the sign of the First Token of the Melchizedek Priesthood or Sign of the Nail by brining the left hand in front of you with the hand in cupping shape, the left arm forming a square; also by bringing the right hand is also brought forward, the palm down, the fingers close together, the thumb extended, and by placing the thumb over the left hip. This is the sign."

"Now repeat in your mind after me the words of the covenant, at the same time representing the Execution of the Penalty:"

"I solemnly covenant in the name of the Son that I will never reveal the First Token of the Melchizedek Priesthood or Sign of the Nail, with its accompanying name,and sign and penalty. Rather than do so, I would suffer my life to be taken."

(Patrons perform the action as the Officiator guides them.)

"That will do." (All patrons sit down.)

It's just a matter of time before this comes out.
topic image
Stephanopoulos Catches Mitt Romney Lying For The Lord
Monday, Feb 19, 2007, at 08:45 AM
Original Author(s): Jim Huston
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
This may not stay up long:


In this short, Mitt Romney states that when Jesus Christ comes again, he will appear in Jerusalem.

Mitt Romney: "Our belief is just like it says in the bible, that, that the Messiah will come to Jerusalem, stand on the Mount Of Olives, and that, that ah, the Mount Of Olives will be a place wheres there is the great gathering and so forth. It's the, it's the same as the other Christian tradition."

Stephanopoulos: "Actually, we checked in with a Mormon spokesman who said that's not exactly true. They believe the New Jerusalem is here in the United States, in Missouri, and that's where Jesus is going to come."

Romney has it wrong. The Mormon Jesus will not come to Jerusalem, the Mormon Jesus will appear in America first.

Interesting. Either Romney is lying about his own religion or he simply just doesn't know.

Mormon Doctrine - Moses 7:62
And righteousness will I send down out of heaven; and truth will I send forth out of the earth, to bear testimony of mine Only Begotten; his resurrection from the dead; yea, and also the resurrection of all men; and righteousness and truth will I cause to sweep the earth as with a flood, to gather out mine elect from the four quarters of the earth, unto a place which I shall prepare, an Holy City, that my people may gird up their loins, and be looking forth for the time of my coming; for there shall be my tabernacle, and it shall be called Zion, a New Jerusalem.
topic image
Bill Maher On Mormonism And Religion In Politics And Mitt Romney
Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007, at 08:25 AM
Original Author(s): Bill Maher
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
See this while it lasts:

topic image
Romney Family Tree Has Polygamy Branch
Monday, Feb 26, 2007, at 07:35 AM
Original Author(s): Jennifer Dobner And Glen Johnson
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From The Huffington Post:
SALT LAKE CITY - While Mitt Romney condemns polygamy and its prior practice by his Mormon church, the Republican presidential candidate's great-grandfather had five wives and at least one of his great-great grandfathers had 12.

Romney's great-grandfather, Miles Park Romney, married his fifth wife in 1897. That was more than six years after Mormon leaders banned polygamy and more than three decades after a federal law barred the practice.

Romney's great-grandmother, Hannah Hood Hill, was the daughter of polygamists. She wrote vividly in her autobiography about how she "used to walk the floor and shed tears of sorrow" over her own husband's multiple marriages.

Romney's father, former Michigan Gov. George Romney, was born in Chihuahua, Mexico, where Mormons fled in the 1800s to escape religious persecution and U.S. laws forbidding polygamy. He and his family did not return to the United States until 1912, more than two decades after the church issued "The Manifesto" banning polygamy.

"When you read the family's history, you realize how important polygamy was to them," said Todd Compton, a Mormon and independent historian who wrote a book about the polygamous life of the church's founder, Joseph Smith. "They left America and started again as pioneers, after they had done it over and over again previously."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wi...
topic image
A Mormon President? I Don't Think So
Tuesday, Mar 6, 2007, at 08:14 AM
Original Author(s): Alex Beam, Globe Columnist
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From Boston.COM:
By now, almost every newspaper in America has published an analysis of Mitt Romney's presidential aspirations titled "Can a Mormon Be Elected President?" The stories follow a preordained path to arrive at the politically and socially desirable answer: Yes.

These set pieces serve mainly to make the not particularly religion-savvy political commentariat feel good about themselves. The writer appears unbiased, and the article inevitably validates the cherished American myth about our tolerance for diversity.

Can a Mormon be elected president in 2008? No.

Even Romney himself has his doubts. Last week's leaked campaign memo unearthed by Globe reporter Scott Helman stated that "Romney's sensitivity to his Mormon faith as a campaign issue is apparent throughout the plan. It acknowledges that some view Mormonism as weird and lists ways Romney should defend his faith, from highlighting the way he has lived his life, rather than which church he attends, to acknowledging theological differences with mainline Christian denominations while refusing to be drawn into an extensive discussion of Mormon doctrine and practices."
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/livi...
topic image
Mitt Romney's Commie Phrase Sparks Rage
Wednesday, Mar 21, 2007, at 07:17 AM
Original Author(s): Boston Herald
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From the Boston Herald.com:
Cubans in Miami are steaming mad at former Gov. Mitt Romney for shooting his mouth off in stumbling Spanish, mispronouncing names and erroneously associating a notorious Fidel Castro-spewed Communist catch phrase with freedom fighters.

Politicians in South Florida have lashed out at the former Massachusetts governor and 2008 presidential hopeful for describing the socialist saying “Patria o muerte, venceremos” as “inspiring” and for claimingthe phrase was swiped from liberty-seeking Cubans by leftist admirers of Castro.

The phrase, which means “Fatherland or death, we shall overcome,” was bellowed as a political speech sign-off by the dictator for decades.

Romney also garnered criticism for his hard-line stance on immigration and ending the talk with the phrase “Libertad, Libertad, Libertad,” a revolutionary saying made famous in the gangster movie “Scarface,” which many Cubans feel plays on cultural stereotypes.

But it was the former Bay State governor’s use of an infamous Fidel Castro line that sparked the most controversy.

“Hugo Chavez has tried to steal an inspiring phrase - Patria o muerte, venceremos,” Romney said. “It does not belong to him. It belongs to a free Cuba.”

But scholars and prominent Cubans contend the saying has always been a Communist rallying cry and that it represents the very essence of Fidel Castro’s oppressive regime.

“It means communism. It means Fidel Castro,” said Florida state Rep. Rene Garcia, a Republican who was at the March 9 speech. “It’s a Communist catch phrase.”
http://news.bostonherald.com/politics...
topic image
Mormon Base a Mixed Blessing for Romney
Wednesday, Apr 4, 2007, at 08:13 AM
Original Author(s): Alec Macgillis
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From The Washington Post:
It is the rare presidential candidate who comes to Idaho to raise money, but there was Mitt Romney last month, packing more than 100 people, at up to $2,300 a head, into the Crystal Ballroom in Boise.

"Nearly every seat was filled. Just about everybody that's anybody was there," said Grant Ipsen, a former Idaho state legislator. "I don't think I'd ever attended another fundraiser for a federal candidate in Idaho."

Mormons made up at least half the crowd, organizers said. Altogether, the two-day swing brought in well over $1 million for Romney.

Mormons are fueling his strong fundraising operation, which this week reported raising $21 million, the most of any Republican candidate. And they are laying the foundation for a potent grass-roots network -- including a cadre of young church members experienced in door-to-door missions who say they are looking forward to hitting the streets for him.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/...
topic image
Mitt Romney On Jay Leno Wed Nite Plus Black Comedian Response
Friday, May 4, 2007, at 07:15 AM
Original Author(s): Cricket
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
I happened to see Mitt on Jay Leno's Tonight Show on Wed evening. Overall he came across as able to laugh at himself and was smart in bringing up the Mormon issue and the 1972 Blacks revelation first and on his own terms.

He said American's want a president who believes in God and who has faith and that it doesn't matter what church a president belongs to. He conveyed the impression that his church is just another "church" - no big deal.

He said his father George Romney marched with Martin Luther King for Civil Rights, (I'd like to fact check that claim.) In 1978 when Mitt heard about the revelation he was driving and had to pull over because he was crying with a sense of relief because he had wanted that to happen.

One could also get a sense that Mitt was born with a silver spoon in his mouth because he said his father George and J. Willard Marriott were best friends, for whom he was named after.

What was best was that after the break Leno had D.L. Hughley. This guy was sharp as a tack and took off on the Romney/Mormon/Black theme.

He had met Mitt backstage and called him a nice guy. He also stated that it took Mormons until 1978 to include blacks into the fold when they were "sinners" prior to that. This meant that when Blacks die they would go to heaven to be slaves to White folks.

He brought the house down when he said, "Yeah, like I am going to die, go to heaven and be a slave to Donnie and Marie forever."

So whatever Mitt did to normalize Mormonism, this Black comedian dismantled it with satire and humor bringing out how absurd this quirky cult is.
topic image
Romney Assails Sharpton's Mormon Comment
Thursday, May 10, 2007, at 08:11 AM
Original Author(s): Mike Glover, Associated Press Writer
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From Yahoo! News:
On Monday, Sharpton said in a debate that "those of us who believe in God" will defeat Romney for the White House. He denied he was questioning the Mormon's own belief in God.

Rather, the New York Democrat said he was contrasting himself with Christopher Hitchens, the atheist author he was debating at the time.

"As for the one Mormon running for office, those who really believe in God will defeat him anyways, so don't worry about that; that's a temporary situation," Sharpton said during a debate with Hitchens at the New York Public Library.
topic image
Is This What Scares People About Romney? Does Mormonism Teach That The Church Is To Be #1 - Love It More Than Your Spouse Or Your Family?
Friday, May 11, 2007, at 09:22 AM
Original Author(s): Susieq#1
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From the temple endowment ceremony and marriage ceremony:

"The Law of Consecration --which is:(I am only including this particular one on this post as it has it directly applies to the marriage covenant.)

Actual words from the temple dialog/ceremony follows:

A couple will now come to the altar. We are instructed to give unto you the Law of Consecration as contained in the book of Doctrine and Covenants, in connection with the Law of the Gospel and the Law of Sacrifice which you have already received.

It is that you do consecrate yourselves, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you, to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the building up of the Kingdom of God on the earth and for the establishment of Zion.

All arise. Each of you bring your right arm to the square.

You and each of you covenant and promise before God, angels, and these witnesses at this altar, that you do accept the Law of Consecration as contained in the Doctrine and Covenants, in that you do consecrate yourselves, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you, to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the building up of the Kingdom of God on the earth and for the establishment of Zion.

Each of you bow your head and say "yes."

Then and only then may you be sealed in the marriage ceremony.

Here is the ceremony.

Sometimes, the officiator will allow an exchange of rings at the end of the ceremony, and a kiss.

(I don't know the current policy on this practice. Maybe someone else does.)

Officiator: Brother ______, [naming groom] and Sister ______, [naming bride] please join hands in the Patriarchal Grip or Sure Sign of the Nail.

Marriage Couple: Joins hands in the "Patriarchal Grip, or Sure Sign of the Nail."This token is given by clasping the right hands, interlocking the little fingers and placing the tip of the forefinger upon the center of the wrist. No clothing should interfere with the contact of the forefinger upon the wrist.

Officiator: Brother ______, do you take Sister ______ by the right hand and receive her unto yourself to be your lawful and wedded wife for time and all eternity, with a covenant and promise that you will observe and keep all the laws, rites, and ordinances pertaining to this Holy Order of Matrimony in the New and Everlasting Covenant, and this you do in the presence of God, angels, and these witnesses of your own free will and choice?

Groom: Yes.

Officiator: Sister ______ do you take brother ______ by the right hand and give yourself to him to be his lawful and wedded wife, and for him to be your lawful and wedded husband, for time and all eternity, with a covenant and promise that you will observe and keep all the laws, rites and ordinances pertaining to this Holy Order of Matrimony in the New and Everlasting Covenant, and this you do in the presence of God, angels, and these witnesses of your own free will and choice?

Bride: Yes.

Officiator:

By virtue of the Holy Priesthood and the authority vested in me, I pronounce you ______, and ______, legally and lawfully husband and wife for time and all eternity, and I seal upon you the blessings of the holy resurrection with power to come forth in the morning of the first resurrection clothed in glory, immortality and eternal lives, and I seal upon you the blessings of kingdoms, thrones, principalities, powers, dominions and exaltations, with all the blessings of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and say unto you: be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth that you may have joy and rejoicing in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

All these blessings, together with all the blessings appertaining unto the New and Everlasting Covenant, I seal upon you by virtue of the Holy Priesthood, through your faithfulness, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, Amen."

Reference: http://www.ldsendowment.org/terrestri...

Is this the key to understanding the dedication of Mormons to their church:

LAW of CONSECRATION

"It is that you do consecrate yourselves, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you, to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the building up of the Kingdom of God on the earth and for the establishment of Zion."

Is this what bothers voters about having Mormon in the White House ...???
topic image
Mitt Romney Pisses Me Off Again
Monday, Jul 2, 2007, at 08:20 AM
Original Author(s): Byualumnuts
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
Last night on the news was a story about Romney explaining away his absence from serving during the Viet Nam war: he went on a mission. Boy, do I ever know that story oh so well.

During that time there was 3 ways to stay out of the draft: 1) Keep a II-S deferment by staying in school, which was only good for 4 years 2) Go on a mission 3) A combination of both.

The trick was to stay in school until you were called on a mission. Before leaving on a mission, you put your name on the Army Reserve or Nation Guard waiting list. When you got off your mission, your name was up for the Army Reserve or National Guard in addition to re-enrolling in school.

I didn't serve a mission, had a draft lottery number of 9, so after graduating from BYU in 4 years, I was drafted. Meanwhile, all my friends were pulling the mission trick to stay out of the draft.

I was once asked by Dean Christensen, former state legislator in our ward, to give a talk on why young men went on missions. I got up and told it exactly how it was. I told the congregation that all the boys were going on missions to avoid being drafted. The people didn't like me in that ward.

Now here we have Romney acting as if he did an honorable thing by going on a mission and not serving his country. The bastard. And he and his family act as if his sons going on missions instead of serving in the military is also honorable. What a load of crap.

Romney cannot be up front and honest, just like his church. Polygamy is a great example. Romney and the church would want us all to believe they abandoned polygamy in 1890 and all they did was abandon the PRACTICE. They still believe in polygamy and Romney has the audacity to say he can't think of anything worse than polygamy. What an ass.

Romney and his church believe Joseph Smith had a polygamy revelation from God. They believe polygamy is a sacred ordinance of God. They believe God is a polygamist. They perform multiple sealings or marriages all the time in their temples. All this and yet they would have the world believe they have nothing to do with polygamy.

In this county you cannot practice communism. But if you believe in communism, you are a communist. In this country, if you obey the law, you cannot practice polygamy. But if you believe in polygamy, you are a polygamist. Romney and all Mormons are polygamists. So admit, it you lying bastards!

And now Romney is a sniveling draft dodger hiding behind his Mormon mission. I'm beginning to hate this guy more every day.
topic image
Romney Criticized For Hotel Pornography
Friday, Jul 6, 2007, at 12:46 PM
Original Author(s): Washington Post
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
From the Washington Post:
BOSTON -- Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney, who rails against the "cesspool" of pornography, is being criticized by social conservatives who argue that he should have tried to halt hardcore hotel movie offerings during his near-decade on the Marriott board.

Two anti-pornography crusaders, as well as two conservative activists of the type Romney is courting, say the distribution of such graphic adult movies runs counter to the family image cultivated by Romney, the Marriotts and their shared Mormon faith.

"Marriott is a major pornographer. And even though he may have fought it, everyone on that board is a hypocrite for presenting themselves as family values when their hotels offer 70 different types of hardcore pornography," said Phil Burress, president of Citizens for Community Values, an anti-pornography group based on Ohio.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/...
topic image
Should Anyone Be Concerned About Mitt Romney's Mormon Beliefs?
Monday, Dec 10, 2007, at 08:33 AM
Original Author(s): Bob Mccue
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
Let me first apologize for the typo ridden nature of what will follow. I dictated it as a stream of consciousness this morning after reading something Christopher Hitchens wrote in a recent Slate Magazine issue with regard to Mitt Romney. As usual, I found Hitchens highly informative and entertaining. However, I thought he did not adequately develop what is the most important point. Hence what follows. But I don't have time to carefully proofread this, or think it through. I offer it on a "for what it's worth" basis. If anyone has Hitchen’s e-mail address, please forward this to him. I would love to have him dig into the social psychological and cognitive bias riven ground around Mitt Romney's presidential bid. For that matter, if anyone who reads this has access to other people who have the kind of podium to which Hitchens has access, I invite you to send this to them for their consideration. There are, no doubt, others who can say what I'm trying to say better than I can, and who will be broadly listened to.

Because I appreciate it when other people give me warning with regard to their biases, before saying anything else I should state mine. Until my mid-40s, I was a fully active, temple recommend carrying, Mormon. I served as a Mormon Bishop for the full five-year term, was in numerous other Mormon leadership capacities, and a short time before having my name removed from the Mormon membership record book, was the "Stake Mission President" (the person responsible for finding converts to Mormonism) in the Mormon community where I live. I am also a practicing tax attorney, have an intellectual bent, and read widely. This latter set of traits created a slow-motion collision that occurred over the course of three decades between the two worlds in which I lived - the Mormon and the secular. I continue to have the deepest respect for most of my Mormon friends and family members, and believe that there are many good things about what Mormons believe and the way they live. I also recognize many profoundly dysfunctionaltraits that the Mormon belief system and community tend to inculcate. Some of those are relevant to the potential US presidency of Mitt Romney.

So, should anyone be concerned that the two solitudes I described above – the dogmatically religious, and the secular – co-exist within Mitt’s highly intelligent cranium? The short version of my views on this topic is set out below. For the long story as to why I hold these views, see two sets of notes that I made for myself as I was attempting to rewire my own Mormon cranium. They can be found at http://mccue.cc/bob/documents/rs.deni....

To answer my question, yes, Mitt Romney's Mormon beliefs should be of concern to anyone who is considering making him the most powerful person on Earth. This is in spite of the fact that Mitt is in most ways an admirable human being. First of all, he has the single most important requirement for US presidential office -- a full head of hair. And not just any full head of hair. Mitt’s is magisterial, as is most of the rest of his appearance – athletic bearing; strong jaw; nice smile; good-looking family; etc. And as Mitt pointed out, he is the only Republican candidate for the US presidency to have only been married to (and likely sexually intimate with) only one woman, and this, ironically, in spite of Mormonism's polygamist roots. Mitt inherited a lot of money, and then made much more on his own. His contribution to salvaging the scandal plagued Salt Lake Olympics was immense. He has done a reasonable job as the-against-the-odds Republican Governor of liberal Massachusetts, courtesy in no small part to a remarkable ability to flip-flop his politics in order to satisfy the crowd to which he happens to be playing. This chamaleonness is, by the way, a trait that one should expect in Mormons. They have traits also found in Asia in that regard, and due to the same strong group oriented social forces in which they are raised. See Richard Nisbett’s “The Geography of Thought” for background in this regard. But I digress.

In short, Mitt Romney has a proven track record as a good leader, and a capable politician. I purposefully did not link the words "good" and "politician" to avoid the inevitable charge of oxymoronism, which reminds me that I should note for the record what everyone who regularly types the word "Mormon" already knows – that the automatic spell corrector in Microsoft Word tends to change that to “moron”. I don't know what that means, but I've always found it funny and it is apropos what I'm about to say about Mormons in general, and Mitt Romney in particular.

So here's the rub. Mitt Romney is a magical thinker. Some of the other presidential candidates are as well. So, what I have to say about Mitt applies to them too. There are degrees of magical thinking. Each candidate should be carefully questioned in this regard. The extent of a person’s magical thinking, and the circumstances in which it is likely to occur, are important ways of testing their reliability. In times of stress and when making decisions related to ambiguous phenomena, a tendency toward magical thinking will become more influential because in those situations, we tend to fall back upon our instincts. It is there that we find magical thinking if we are going to find it. And arguably, the president of the United States most important function is to act wisely in times of crisis and with regard to ambiguous phenomena.

What do I mean when I say that Mitt Romney is a magical thinker? Our reasoning proceeds from the most basic assumptions that we make with regard to reality. Mitt Romney's basic assumptions are, to an extent, magical. He believes in all kinds of things that non-Mormons would consider outlandish, not the least of which is that a former con man cum treasure hunter named Joseph Smith visited personally with God on many occasions and founded God’s only “true” church, the Mormon Church, after “translating” a book of ancient records he claims an angel gave to him. This translation was done for the most part without the ancient book present, by Smith looking through the same “peep stone” he used to pretend to look for buried treasure in order to extract fees for services rendered from gullible farmers. Having attracted a following as a religious leader, Smith exercised the typical alpha male prerogative and started to have sex with many of the females in his group, many of whom were young teenagers or married to other men. When caught, he said God told him to do this and that other men should also do so, as long as God (through Smith) commanded them. This gave Smith control over much of the sexual activity in his community, which is a great way of keeping people in line. This is only the beginning of an amazing litany of bizarre facts Mitt Romney believes to be accurate, and that form the foundation for his belief in the authenticity and hence reliability of current Mormon authority. And we have not mentioned the basic Christian beliefs which to non-Christians are as justifiably bizarre in some cases as Mormon beliefs are to non-Mormons.

In many ways, Mitt Romney is merely (if that is the right word) typical of many extremely intelligent people (Mormon and other) I have met who will look you straight in the eye and tell you that the Earth is not much more than 6,000 years old. Some of these people have Ph.D.'s granted by real universities. I've met many other similar people who accept that biological evolution occurred, but not with regard to human beings. Other similarly intelligent people believe that aliens really do interact on a regular basis with human beings.

Magical thinking, of course, occurs for the most part at the subconscious level, and is generally speaking only recognizable from outside the social group within which it occurs. For example, many hard-core evangelical Christians believe that their conclusions with regard to the age of the Earth are based in science. That is, science that includes assumptions such as that God placed appropriately aged dinosaur bones in the Earth in order to test our religious faith. This, of course, is not science. It is magical thinking. But try to persuade a young recreationists of that. The same sort of analysis holds with regard to Jehovah's Witnesses and their beliefs with regard to blood transfusions. One of their basic assumptions, based on the Bible, is that our spirits are inextricably tied up with our blood. Hence, a blood transfusion connotes a type of spiritual death. This kind of assumption is not provable, but neither is it disprovable. Religious beliefs tend to be like this. If they were disprovable to a high degree of probability they would eventually fade from consciousness and this would threaten the foundation of the religious group. Accordingly, over time the religious beliefs that persist tend not to be disprovable. That is why, for the most part, the Christian religion no longer relies upon the idea that the Earth is at the center of the universe. The idea that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, more or less, persists that within a very small group. That idea is dying as a result of disproof. Ideas with regard to the nature of the human spirit and its connection to blood, however, cannot be disproven. Hence, this type of idea will probably persist.

There is a way to predict where magical thinking will interfere with our rational processes. Have a look at the "belief maps" founded pages 18 through 25 of http://mccue.cc/bob/documents/rs.does... in this regard. There I attempt to illustrate the way in which scientific knowledge conflicts with various belief systems. Well-educated young earth creationists, for example, are forced into magical thinking mode only where the most important parts of their belief system conflict with science. The same applies for the Jehovah's Witnesses, the alien abductionists, and every other odd religious or ideological group you can think of. One of the patterns that comes into focus as a result of this analysis is the powerful correlation between group based belief systems, and the magical thinking dysfunction. This probably has to do with our small group evolutionary history. We are intensely tribal, and only recently – a few ticks on the evolutionary clock -- have we been attempting to meld ourselves into a vast flocks instead of the small herds that gave rise to our biology and hence our instincts. Until recently, status within the herd was the single best predictor of survival and reproductive opportunity. Accordingly, our instincts push us toward conformity with the strongest forces we perceive within our most important social group. These instincts are so strong that they suppress to a large degree the perception of evidence that would push us toward the fringes of, or out of, that social group. They even more ferociously suppress information that threatens the existence of that social group. We are all subject to these perception foibles.

The phenomena I have just outlined are being carefully studied by our social and other scientists under the “cognitive bias”, “cognitive dissonance” and various other labels. One of the ideas that I think is most helpful in that regard is "bounded rationality". This is being applied to help us better understand many aspects of social psychology, and economics. The idea, in a nutshell, is that we are not rational in the ordinary sense. However, once our circumstances are understood, our behavior generally speaking makes sense within those circumstances. For example, if I am a Mormon and I believe that what happens after death is much more important than what happens during this life, and I must obey certain rules in order to achieve crucially important rewards and avoid terrible punishment after death, then it makes sense that I would spend a great deal of time, money and energy doing things that appear to be irrational to people who do not share my beliefs. Precisely the same explanation applies for suicide bombers, who in some cases believe they are earning fabulous afterlife awards for themselves and their families, while in others they are driven by the same psychology that causes soldiers to charge out of the trenches into the face of virtually certain death.

So, what does this have to do with Mitt Romney and Mormonism? Well, as I indicated above, it is helpful to delineate the areas within which each belief system that conflict with what most of us would consider to be rational thought processes. And there is something odd, and particularly pernicious, about Mormonism in that regard. This can perhaps best be expressed by way of something that was told to me as a joke. It's not a very good joke, but it is a fine play on words. It goes like this. Catholics and Mormons disbelieve the opposite dogmas. That is, Catholic dogma says that the Pope is infallible, but no Catholic believes that. On the other hand, Mormon dogma holds that the Mormon prophet is fallible, and no Mormon beliefs that.

You might have to read that more than once to get the penny to drop.

So there we have it. In addition to the usual run of Christian dogma that should trouble Americans with regard to many of their Presidential candidates, we have the additional problem in Mitt’s case that when the Mormon prophet speaks, powerful instincts inside of him will move his belief system toward whatever the Mormon prophet has said. To be fair to Mitt, we don't have to worry about a phone call from Salt Lake City telling him to invade Iran. In fact, we shouldn't worry about a phone call from Salt Lake City telling him to do anything, unless it comes from one of his Mormon relatives.

I would say that it is extremely improbable that the Mormon prophet would attempt to overtly influence Mitt Romney's political decisions. The slightest whiff of that would be political suicide for Mitt and Mormonism. Mormonism’s leadership is pragmatic enough to avoid that. Here is, rather, how this process is far more likely to work. It would not be surprising for a Mormon prophet to begin to speak out strongly against gay marriage, or equal rights for women, or the importance of preventing changes in educational standards that would encourage more understanding within each religious group of how other religious groups work. The same could be said of many other controversies over issues where the Mormon belief system is at odds with secular values. Without making a conscious connection between what the Mormon prophet is saying and what he believes, Mitt Romney's head is wired so that it is extremely probable that whatever the Mormon prophet happens to say will ring true to Mitt. And, to the extent he has influence, which as the American president he would have in spades that influence will tend to be exercised in the direction indicated by the Mormon prophet.

Much has been made of the comparison between the Mormon Romney and the Catholic Kennedys. This doesn't work for me. Catholicism is a very old religion. A lot of its youthful arrogance has been beaten out of it. There is a good analogy between the way in which the social organism that is an aunt or beehive matures, and the way in which religious groups mature. Younger hives and religious groups tend to be more erratic and aggressive. Mormonism is still young religious group, which explains to a large degree of continuing aggressive proselytizing and isolationist tendencies. Hence, the probability of the erratic behavior from a Mormon prophet is far higher than with regard to a Pope, and as I have already indicated in any event, the influence of the Pope over well-educated Catholics is minute compared to the influence of the Mormon prophet over Mormons like Mitt Romney.

I should also note that I have profound concern with regard to the influence of Christian dogma, and the way in which that could in and of itself influence Mitt Romney, not to mention the fact that a Mormon prophet could amplify some aspect of Christian dogma that would also have an effect on Mitt Romney's decision-making. It is probable that one of the significant influences on US foreign policy during the Bush administration and another crucial junctures in history, has been the belief that there is something special about the land around Jerusalem and the connection of the Jewish people to that land, in the context of the second coming of Christ and the Apocalypse predicted by the New Testament. I believe that this influence should be rooted out of US foreign policy to the extent possible. Mitt Romney is probably a step in the wrong direction in that regard.

Human history points to the crucial importance of democratic principle as a restraint on power. The Mormon Church and other similar religious institutions are non-democratic. Power is systematically abused within those organizations, though generally speaking with the best of intent. In order to preserve that power, this type of religious institution tends to resist government involvement of most types. That is, the smaller the government influence, the larger the playing field for the religious institution and its undemocratically elected leadership. The greater that scope, the more opportunity the religious institution has two monopolize the time, money and other resources on its members.

The Mormon prophet and other leaders of the Mormon Church are products of the dysfunctional system I just described. As a group, they are very old, white males. No major policy decision can occur without unanimity within the group. This ensures the decision-making precedents developed long ago in different times are the default mechanism. The group appoints its own successors, thus cementing into place a glacial rate of change. And some of them have demonstrated the ability to be outspoken in their ignorance

The idea that the pronouncements of men of this type, no matter how well intended, may have a significant influence on the President of the United States should be bone chilling.
topic image
This Is The Best Analysis Of Mitt Romney's Speech I've Seen
Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007, at 08:41 AM
Original Author(s): Koriwhore
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
http://www.alternet.org/rights/70089/

Romney: Some Beliefs are More Equal than Others

Some choice quotes:

"Mitt Romney's speech in Texas on Thursday was supposed to be an attempt to fend off religious bigotry. Instead, it betrays some prejudices of its own (against secular people), and seems to provoke others to bigoted statements."

"Mormons are good people, but some of their forebears were also involved in violence in the 19th century of a sort that other Americans viewed as terrorism."

"What Romney omits is that many of the "religious people" among the founding fathers were Deists, who did not believe in revelation or miracles or divine intervention in human affairs."

"Deists, freethinkers and Freemasons–the kind of people that Romney was complaining about– produced the First Amendment. When Tom Jefferson tried out an earlier version of it in Virginia, some of the members of the Virginia assembly actually complained that freedom of religion would allow the practice of Islam in the US. Jefferson's response to that kind of bigotry was that other people believing in other religions did not pick his pocket or break his leg, so why should he care how they worshipped? And that's all Romney had to say. But he did not want to say that. Romney said the opposite. He implied that is is actively bad for a democracy if people are unbelievers or if there is a strict separation of religion and state."

"As for the insistence that you need religion for political freedom, that is silly. Organized religion has many virtues, but pushing for political liberty is seldom among them. Religion is about controlling people. No religiously based state has ever provided genuine democratic governance. You want religion in politics, go to Iran."

"So Romney's so-called plea for tolerance is actually a plea for the privileging of religion in American public life. He just wants his religion to share in that privilege that he wants to install. Ironically, the very religious pluralism of the United States, which he appears to praise, will stand in the way of his project."
topic image
Will The Marriage Of Religion And Politics Have Unintended Consequences?
Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007, at 08:46 AM
Original Author(s): Rob Shiveley
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
I'm quite surprised to see the intense focus being placed on religion in the current election cycle. It's quite disturbing and fascinating at the same to watch Mitt Romney stand up in front of a nation of 300 million people and utter his belief that "Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind." in such a highly publicized forum.

What Mitt did and is doing is the complete opposite of what JFK did when he ran for President 47 years ago when Kennedy professed his firm belief that religion and politics should remain separate "I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute" and that he intended to do everything in his power to enforce the separation and uphold a secular (not religious) form of government. No religious organization, including his own Catholic Church, which JFK mentioned specifically 19 times in his address, would ever be permitted to influence his decisions as President of the U.S.

Keep in mind that the definition of secular is the state of being separate from religion. Secularism is not synonomous with atheism (contrary to popular belief). Secularism about real world matters like science, math, physics, biology, medicine, law, finance, accounting, history, etc.

To witness the impact and results emanating from a religious form of government, or a theocracy, one only needs to take a look at Islamic governments, Saudi Arabia being the most strict. One can argue that communism is a form of theocracy, where citizens are forced to practice atheism by severely limiting access to religion and withdrawing state support of religion (no special incentives are granted to religious organizations, such as tax breaks). Both communism and Islam seem to work fairly well. Saudi Arabia has a booming economy based on their significant presence in the oil industry. China is growing, thriving and threatening to displace the other world powers in manufacturing, science and engineering.

The biggest drawback is the lack of many freedoms we have traditionally cherishe and protected: information (speech), right to dissention, gather with like minded people (necessary for distribution of information and dissention), the press (independent watchdog organization as part of free democracies checks and balances )

The litmus test for today's US leaders seems to be:
  1. Declaring Jesus as their personal savior and the savior for mankind
  2. Declaring Agnostics, Atheists and Humanists (non-religious believers) as less favorable and almost persona non grata. Perhaps they would argue that this group of non-believers may not only be disrepected, but may be excluded from the same rights enjoyed by religious believers, and especially Christians.
  3. Declaring their support for ridiculous ideas such as creationism, eliminating a women's right to control her body and make personal medical decisions, including abortion, restricting or eliminating sex education, etc.
  4. Belittling science when inconvenient or when the scientific evidence flys in the face of the conventionally held religious dogmas.
  5. Support for launching pre-emptive wars and threatening the use of force even when the evidence doesn't support this.
  6. Support for stupid economic theories like supply-based economics and trickle down theory (one of the worst disasters from the Reagan era) and eliminating labor protections and tariffs that allow working people to earn a fair living and put food on the table, buy homes, cars and maybe have some time off for rest and relaxation with family and friends.
  7. Disastrous polities like protection of private property and inheritance laws and favorable tax laws for the wealthy who have largely received wealth through inheritance or pure luck. Don't you agree that buying a stock like Google early on is sheer pure luck? So is winning the lottery.
  8. Promoting and supporting disastrous policies that destroy the environment: politicizing and preventing science and research on global warming, promoting rampant consumerism and the accumulation of cheap "stuff" that gets quickly consumed, used up and tossed in the landfill.
  9. (The list could go on, but these are a few I thought of.)
I hate to imagine our once great country, if the U.S. continues down this path that is a direct result knocking down the barrier between religion and politics. The middle class is taking a terrible beating today and will soon be eliminated if we continue going down this path. There will be 2 classes: Rich and Poor. The personal freedoms we've long taken for granted will continue to slip away, since the state-established theocracy will be threatened by any dissention and all informaition and communication will need to be tightly controlled.

I think is was the Mitt's warning of the dangers of secularism that troubled me the most. As he attempted to chip away at the wall between religion and government he mixed metaphors and poor examples, such as the failure of religion in Europe due to the establishment of official state religion: "The establishment of state religions in Europe did no favor to Europe's churches. And though you will find many people of strong faith there, the churches themselves seem to be withering away." (Isn't that what Mitt and the Republican right is working so hard to do? To establish Christianity as the "official" US brand of religion?)

The next year will be interesting. But I don't have a good feeling for the direction we are heading. The consequences could be disastrous: elmination of personal liberties and civil rights, weak econonmy, destruction of the middle class (good bye to the American Dream(tm))

I wonder what some of the other 6.3 billion people of the world thought about this speech? Were they scratching their heads? Were they fearful? Were they terrified at the potential disaster we are headed for?

One last thing: it was noteworthy that Mitt mentioned Mormonism only once during his speech.
topic image
Mutating Mitt
Wednesday, Dec 12, 2007, at 07:36 AM
Original Author(s): Tal Bachman
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
Mitt Romney is pathetic.

While running for Massachusetts senator in 1994, and then for governor in 2002, Mitt Romney repeatedly announced his firm conviction that abortion had to be kept "safe and legal" in the United States, and vowed to do everything he could to ensure that it did ( http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=cFMdK0T... ).

Romney even went so far as to reveal that "he became committed to legalized abortion after a relative died during an illegal abortion, and that the abortion made him see 'that regardless of one's beliefs about choice, you would hope it would be safe and legal'." (source: Boston Herald, 10/26/1994).

No wonder, then, that in 2002, he wrote the following in response to a National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) questionnaire:

I respect and will protect a woman’s right to choose…Women should be free to choose based on their own beliefs, not mine and not the government’s.”

And he responded, in a signed statement, to a 2002 Planned Parenthood questionnaire in this way:

"Do you support the substance of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade? YES

"Do you support state funding of abortion services through Medicaid for low-income women? YES

"In 1998 the FDA approved the first packaging of emergency contraception, also known as the 'morning after pill'. Emergency contraception is a high dose combination of oral contraceptives that if taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, can safely prevent a pregnancy from occurring. Do you support efforts to increase access to emergency contraception? YES"
(See http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content...)

And believe me, there is a lot more where this all came from...The truth is that Mitt Romney, from 2003 to 2007, was a boldly pro-choice governor (for another little clip, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKwVNU... ). His own running mate, Kerry Healey, noted that there wasn't a "dime's worth of difference" between Romney's abortion position, and that of his NARAL-supported Democratic opponent Shannon O'Brien.

In short, throughout his 2002 campaign for Massachusetts governor and well into his term, Mitt Romney sounded exactly like Barbara Boxer on abortion.

As his term came to a close, however, and Romney began to prepare for his run at the GOP presidential nomination, he suddenly sounded exactly like Jerry Falwell on abortion; and today, at any Romney speech, with the kind of unblinking smile you can see on the face of anyone without a moral core, you will hear him announce that he is "firmly pro-life".

And you may also hear the story about how he changed his mind. According to Romney, he changed his mind about abortion rights upon hearing that stem cell research, of which he had been an enthusiastic public supporter for years ("I am in favor of stem cell research. I will work and fight for stem cell research"), required the termination of 14 day old embryos. But how could a guy who'd given speeches supporting stem cell research and promised to lobby Bush about it, not have known the most basic thing about it? It's absurd.

Even nuttier is the idea that using a clump of 14 day old stem cells for research moved Romney, whereas 35 years of dismembering and scorching to death tens of millions of fetuses, almost all of whom were well on their way to full viability (and some already beyond it), and then tossing their remains into the trash, never moved him at all. I mean, if that is true, Romney's an awfully weird guy. And if it's not true - well, what am I saying? Of course it's not true. What IS true is that if Romney had decided in 2004 to run for a second term as governor of Massachusetts instead of for the GOP nomination for president, he would still be "firmly pro-choice", and no one would have ever heard his ridiculous conversion story, since there wouldn't have been a "conversion" to begin with. Indeed, the only thing that Romney's career indicates he is truly "converted" to is saying or doing whatever it takes to satisfy his desire for more wealth, status, and power. Not even his own religion's longstanding official position against abortion induced him to convert to being pro-life. No - it took his desire for more political power to do that.

Even more embarrassing is that Romney is still flip-flopping on this issue. Specifically, on his website clip and in at least one interview I know of, he says that he believes that states, not courts, should have jurisdiction over abortion. And he specifically objects to a "one size fits all" abortion law for the whole country. Yet just a few days ago during the CNN Republican debate, Romney announced that his preferred solution would NOT be to allow states to handle the issue, but rather, to have Congress make a single law prohibiting abortion except for in extreme cases!

Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank sums up Romney this way:

"The real Romney is clearly an extraordinarily ambitious man with no perceivable political principle whatsover. He is the most intellectually dishonest human being in the history of politics.” (http://www.boston.com/partners/worldn...)

Romney must resent this kind of language, but I'm not sure who is more to blame for it than Romney himself. That's just what brazen flip-flopping on matters of life and death, merely for purposes of political expediency, does.

Pretty pathetic.
topic image
Too Funny: Bogus Romney Xmas Cards
Sunday, Dec 30, 2007, at 08:20 AM
Original Author(s): Infymus
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics...
Many South Carolina Republicans got a bogus holiday greeting card this week, purported to be from presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, that cites some controversial passages of the Book of Mormon.

"We wish you and your family a happy holiday season and a joyful New Year. The Romney family," the card says.

The last page features a photograph of a temple above a box that says "Paid For By The Boston Massachusetts Temple."

Romney's campaign said the former Massachusetts governor had nothing to do with the cards, postmarked Thursday from Columbia with a 41-cent stamp, and Boston Temple President Ken Hutchins said Saturday he first heard about the mailing Friday from a woman in Charleston, South Carolina.

The card contains passages that underscore some differences between the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and those of Christian denominations that are prevalent in South Carolina.

"We have now clearly shown that God the Father had a plurality of wives, one or more being in eternity by whom He begat our spirits as well as the spirit of Jesus His first born, and another being upon the earth by whom he begat the tabernacle of Jesus, as his only begotten in this world," reads one passage from Orson Pratt, cited on the card as an "original member of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles."

The card also cites a passage on Mary's virgin birth that underscores her race. "And it came to pass that I looked and beheld the great city of Jerusalem, and also other cities. And I beheld the city of Nazareth; and in the city of Nazareth I beheld a virgin, and she was exceedingly fair and white." On the card, "fair and white" are in a bolder, larger font and on a separate line.
Those whacky Mormons. Wait, I'm sorry, those peculiar people. Wait, I'm sorry, that changed again, call us Latter Day Saints.

A few years ago on Larry King, the Hinkster stated that Mormons were widely respected for their values and how they live their lives. It just isn't true. People outright distrust Mormons, find their doctrine weird, cannot get past the polygamy, closed societies and Wizard of OZ like temples - not to mention funny white underwear. And 40 thousand men in white shirts pounding on doors to talk about a little boy and some golden plates just isn't working well. Of course, the missionaries are prospering in countries where the people are so poor, there is no access to media or Internet. Left in the dark about Mormonism these people are so bamboozled by the Cult that they take their own gold fillings out to pay for a building that is a matter of pocket change to the Corporation.

Why can't Romney face the camera and say "Yes, I believe that GB Hinskter is a Prophet of God, and receives personal revelation". Naw, he won't do it, because not even his own Prophet can stand up on public television and state, "Yes, we believe AND teach that man through eternal progression can become a God".

Well, I don't know that we teach that.
topic image
Would Romney Continue To Be A Member In Good Standing - If He Were Elected President Of The United States?
Monday, Dec 31, 2007, at 08:42 AM
Original Author(s): Infymus
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
If Romney was elected President, would he continue to be a member in good standing?
  • would he do 100% of his home teaching?
  • would he go to the temple often?
  • would he bow his head in the temple, raise his hand to the square, and promise to do everything in his power to build up the kingdom of god on the earth?
  • would he follow the prophet?
  • would he ask the nation the golden question, the platinum question?
  • would he attend sacrament meeting each week?
  • would he accept any calling in his ward or stake - the lord inspired?
  • would he give talks in sacrament meeting when asked the night before?
  • would he pay a full 10% tithe on his Presidential Salary, give a generous fast offering, and support the missionary fund?
  • would his IRS return indicate to the world how much he has given to TSCC?
  • would he give a BOM to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or any other head of state?
  • would he use his "priesthood powers" to solve the nation's problems?
A vote for Romney is a vote for Mormonism.
topic image
Changes In The White House If Mitt Romney Wins
Wednesday, Jan 16, 2008, at 08:57 AM
Original Author(s): Chimp For The Commander And Chief
Topic: MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2   -Guid-
A Washington, DC. top congressional policy adviser, who is also LDS, has said the vast majority of GOP congressmen are endorsing Mitt Romney.

He thought a Mitt presidency was no longer improbable, but, it is now something that "could happen."

So..., if Mitt Romney became President of the US (code name POTUS) won't we have something we've never had before -- A president who goes to a specific church? All other presidents belonged to religions that didn't have tight congregational boundaries. Now, think about that:

What Ward would POTUS be in?

If you are his new Bishop, here are your top 10 questions:

1. Will you allow an inaugural ball to be held in the cultural hall? Do you mount security cameras on top of each basketball rim and have a secret service detail stationed on the stage?

2. Can you call Mitt and Ann as the Nursery Leaders... even if you really feel inspired?

3. Who is going to home teach them? Will you call someone who needs activation but may not pass the vetting and national security screening?

4. If Harry Reid and Mitt Romney are in the same High Priest group, will you need to be there to keep order?

5. Exactly how will tithing settlement work? Will the Secretary of the Treasury come too?

6. Will you be inviting the new Romney family to speak in Sacrament Meeting... and if they go a little over at what point do you ask them to sit down?

7. Will the Secret Service do a sweep of the building before each meeting? And if the Romney's always leave before Sunday School, will the Sunday School president need to interview them? If they stay, where will you hold the class?

8. Can you call the Secret Service agents to help out in Primary?

9. If you give Mitt a calling and the two Democrats in the Ward raise their hand AGAINST sustaining him - partly out of habit - does the Supreme Court need to be involved?

10. If you can't give them a calling, and they don't attend very often (for presidential stuff) will that mean they're "inactive?" If they're not active, can you give them a Temple Recommend? And if you do, can they go? Will the Secret Service have to screen the temple too?

11. If the President wants to hold Sacrament Meeting at Camp David or the White House for security reasons, is that a conflict of Church and State?

If you're assigned to be the Romney's Home Teacher:

1. Can you just drop by, no appointment?

2. Can you even call them for an appointment or do you have to go through the Chief of Staff?

3. Can you bring by Christmas sweets and cookies? Will they be analyzed? And for how many people - family, secret service details?

4. If you don't come can the IRS do an audit on you?

5. Will they want to do a national security background check?

6. Do you have to have a permanent companion who has been vetted? Can you just grab any teacher or priest to come to you? And what if that priest has been a little wayward. Do you need to search him first?

7. Do you have to help him move in and out of the White House?

8. If Ann Romney gets sick, are you allowed to bring in meals or at least tell the Relief Society about it?

9. What can you share with the Bishop about the Romneys?

10. Do you have to ask them about their year's supply?

11. If you get a late night call for a blessing will reporters follow you around wanting to know what was wrong and what you said?

If Mitt Romney is assigned to be YOUR Home Teacher:

1. Is telling the group leader you haven't been home taught a national security breech?

2. If he wants to come at the end of the month, do you accept his reason "I've been out of town"?

3. Will he drop by unannounced or will the media crews give him away?
 
mcimg
HOME
FAQ
CONTACT ME
370 TOPICS
THE EX-MORMON FORUMS
RSS FEED
Google
Search The
Mormon Curtain




WWW
Mormon Curtain

How to navigate:
  • Click the subject below to go directly to the article.
  • Click the red arrow on the article to return to the top.
  • Right-Click and copythe "-Guid-" (the Link Location URL) for a direct link to the page and article.
Archived Blogs:
Romney's Religion - A Mormon President? No Way.
Why Mitt Romney Can't Be The United States President
Mormon For President: Romney Avoiding Temple Death Oath Talk - For Now
Stephanopoulos Catches Mitt Romney Lying For The Lord
Bill Maher On Mormonism And Religion In Politics And Mitt Romney
Romney Family Tree Has Polygamy Branch
A Mormon President? I Don't Think So
Mitt Romney's Commie Phrase Sparks Rage
Mormon Base a Mixed Blessing for Romney
Mitt Romney On Jay Leno Wed Nite Plus Black Comedian Response
Romney Assails Sharpton's Mormon Comment
Is This What Scares People About Romney? Does Mormonism Teach That The Church Is To Be #1 - Love It More Than Your Spouse Or Your Family?
Mitt Romney Pisses Me Off Again
Romney Criticized For Hotel Pornography
Should Anyone Be Concerned About Mitt Romney's Mormon Beliefs?
This Is The Best Analysis Of Mitt Romney's Speech I've Seen
Will The Marriage Of Religion And Politics Have Unintended Consequences?
Mutating Mitt
Too Funny: Bogus Romney Xmas Cards
Would Romney Continue To Be A Member In Good Standing - If He Were Elected President Of The United States?
Changes In The White House If Mitt Romney Wins
5,418 Articles In 370 Topics
TopicImage TOPIC INDEX (370 Topics)
TopicImage AUTHOR INDEX

  · ADAM GOD DOCTRINE (4)
  · APOLOGISTS - SECTION 1 (25)
  · APOLOGISTS - SECTION 2 (25)
  · ARTICLES OF FAITH (1)
  · BAPTISM FOR THE DEAD - PEOPLE (14)
  · BAPTISM FOR THE DEAD - SECTION 1 (18)
  · BAPTISM FOR THE DEAD - SECTION 2 (14)
  · BLACKS AND MORMONISM (12)
  · BLACKS AND THE PRIESTHOOD (9)
  · BLOOD ATONEMENT (3)
  · BOB BENNETT (1)
  · BOB MCCUE - SECTION 1 (25)
  · BOB MCCUE - SECTION 2 (25)
  · BOB MCCUE - SECTION 3 (25)
  · BOB MCCUE - SECTION 4 (25)
  · BOB MCCUE - SECTION 5 (25)
  · BOB MCCUE - SECTION 6 (19)
  · BONNEVILLE COMMUNICATIONS (2)
  · BOOK OF ABRAHAM - SECTION 1 (24)
  · BOOK OF ABRAHAM - SECTION 2 (23)
  · BOOK OF MORMON - SECTION 1 (25)
  · BOOK OF MORMON - SECTION 2 (25)
  · BOOK OF MORMON - SECTION 3 (15)
  · BOOK OF MORMON EVIDENCES (18)
  · BOOK OF MORMON GEOGRAPHY (24)
  · BOOK OF MORMON WITNESSES (5)
  · BOOK REVIEW - ROUGH STONE ROLLING (28)
  · BOOKS - AUTHORS AND DESCRIPTIONS (12)
  · BOOKS - COMMENTS AND REVIEWS - SECTION 1 (26)
  · BOOKS - COMMENTS AND REVIEWS - SECTION 2 (15)
  · BOY SCOUTS (20)
  · BOYD K. PACKER - SECTION 1 (21)
  · BOYD K. PACKER - SECTION 2 (9)
  · BRIGHAM YOUNG (24)
  · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY - SECTION 1 (25)
  · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY - SECTION 2 (28)
  · BRUCE C. HAFEN (4)
  · BRUCE D. PORTER (1)
  · BRUCE R. MCCONKIE (7)
  · CALLINGS (11)
  · CATHOLIC CHURCH (5)
  · CHANGING DOCTRINE (11)
  · CHILDREN AND MORMONISM - SECTION 1 (24)
  · CHILDREN AND MORMONISM - SECTION 2 (23)
  · CHRIS BUTTARS (1)
  · CHURCH LEADERSHIP (3)
  · CHURCH PROPAGANDA - SECTION 1 (5)
  · CHURCH PUBLISHED MAGAZINES - SECTION 1 (25)
  · CHURCH PUBLISHED MAGAZINES - SECTION 2 (24)
  · CHURCH TEACHING MANUALS (10)
  · CHURCH VAULTS (4)
  · CITY CREEK CENTER (23)
  · CIVIL UNIONS (12)
  · CLEON SKOUSEN (2)
  · COGNITIVE DISSONANCE (2)
  · COMEDY - SECTION 1 (24)
  · COMEDY - SECTION 2 (21)
  · COMEDY - SECTION 3 (24)
  · COMEDY - SECTION 4 (22)
  · COMEDY - SECTION 5 (35)
  · CONCISE DICTIONARY OF MORMONISM (14)
  · D. MICHAEL QUINN (1)
  · D. TODD CHRISTOFFERSON (3)
  · DALLIN H. OAKS - SECTION 1 (19)
  · DALLIN H. OAKS - SECTION 2 (18)
  · DANIEL C. PETERSON - SECTION 1 (22)
  · DANIEL C. PETERSON - SECTION 2 (24)
  · DANIEL C. PETERSON - SECTION 3 (31)
  · DANITES (4)
  · DAVID A. BEDNAR (15)
  · DAVID O. MCKAY (6)
  · DAVID R. STONE (1)
  · DAVID WHITMER (1)
  · DELBERT L. STAPLEY (1)
  · DESERET NEWS (2)
  · DIETER F. UCHTDORF (8)
  · DNA (23)
  · DOCTRINE AND COVENANTS (8)
  · DON JESSE (2)
  · ELAINE S. DALTON (5)
  · EMMA SMITH (4)
  · ENSIGN PEAK (1)
  · EX-MORMON FOUNDATION (33)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 1 (35)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 10 (24)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 11 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 12 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 13 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 14 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 15 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 16 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 17 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 18 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 19 (26)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 2 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 20 (24)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 21 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 22 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 23 (30)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 3 (24)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 4 (24)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 5 (23)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 6 (24)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 7 (25)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 8 (24)
  · EX-MORMON OPINION - SECTION 9 (26)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 1 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 10 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 11 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 12 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 13 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 14 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 15 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 16 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 17 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 18 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 19 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 2 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 20 (24)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 21 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 22 (24)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 23 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 24 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 25 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 26 (52)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 3 (21)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 4 (22)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 5 (24)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 6 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 7 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 8 (25)
  · EX-MORMONISM SECTION 9 (26)
  · EXCOMMUNICATION AND COURTS OF LOVE (19)
  · EZRA TAFT BENSON - SECTION 1 (7)
  · EZRA TAFT BENSON - SECTION 2 (2)
  · FACIAL HAIR (6)
  · FAIR / MADD - APOLOGETICS - SECTION 1 (25)
  · FAIR / MADD - APOLOGETICS - SECTION 2 (24)
  · FAIR / MADD - APOLOGETICS - SECTION 3 (19)
  · FAITH PROMOTING RUMORS (11)
  · FARMS (28)
  · FIRST VISION - SECTION 1 (18)
  · FIRST VISION - SECTION 2 (3)
  · FOOD STORAGE (3)
  · FUNDAMENTALIST LDS (7)
  · GENERAL AUTHORITIES (29)
  · GENERAL CONFERENCE (14)
  · GENERAL NEWS (5)
  · GEORGE P. LEE (1)
  · GORDON B. HINCKLEY - SECTION 1 (23)
  · GORDON B. HINCKLEY - SECTION 2 (20)
  · GORDON B. HINCKLEY - SECTION 3 (22)
  · GRANT PALMER (8)
  · GREGORY L. SMITH (9)
  · GUNNISON MASSACRE (1)
  · H. DAVID BURTON (2)
  · HAROLD B. LEE (1)
  · HATE MAIL I RECEIVE (23)
  · HAUNS MILL (2)
  · HBO BIG LOVE (12)
  · HEBER C. KIMBALL (4)
  · HELEN RADKEY (17)
  · HELLEN MAR KIMBALL (4)
  · HENRY B. EYRING (5)
  · HOLIDAYS (12)
  · HOME AND VISITING TEACHING (9)
  · HOWARD W. HUNTER (1)
  · HUGH NIBLEY (11)
  · HYMNS (7)
  · INTERVIEWS IN MORMONISM (15)
  · JAMES E. FAUST (7)
  · JEFF LINDSAY (6)
  · JEFFREY MELDRUM (1)
  · JEFFREY R. HOLLAND (30)
  · JEFFREY S. NIELSEN (11)
  · JOHN GEE (1)
  · JOHN L. LUND (3)
  · JOHN L. SORENSON (3)
  · JOHN TAYLOR (1)
  · JOSEPH B. WIRTHLIN (1)
  · JOSEPH F. SMITH (1)
  · JOSEPH FIELDING SMITH (6)
  · JOSEPH SITATI (1)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - POLYGAMY - SECTION 1 (21)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - POLYGAMY - SECTION 2 (21)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - PROPHECY (8)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - SECTION 1 (25)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - SECTION 2 (23)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - SECTION 3 (22)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - SECTION 4 (30)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - SEER STONES (7)
  · JOSEPH SMITH - WORSHIP (13)
  · JUDAISM (3)
  · JULIE B. BECK (6)
  · KEITH B. MCMULLIN (1)
  · KERRY MUHLESTEIN (9)
  · KERRY SHIRTS (6)
  · KINDERHOOK PLATES (6)
  · KIRTLAND BANK (6)
  · KIRTLAND EGYPTIAN PAPERS (17)
  · L. TOM PERRY (4)
  · LAMANITE PLACEMENT PROGRAM (3)
  · LAMANITES - SECTION 1 (34)
  · LANCE B. WICKMAN (1)
  · LARRY ECHO HAWK (1)
  · LDS CHURCH - SECTION 1 (18)
  · LDS CHURCH OFFICE BUILDING (9)
  · LDS SOCIAL SERVICES (3)
  · LGBT - AND MORMONISM - SECTION 1 (39)
  · LORENZO SNOW (1)
  · LOUIS C. MIDGLEY (5)
  · LYNN A. MICKELSEN (2)
  · LYNN G. ROBBINS (1)
  · M. RUSSELL BALLARD (11)
  · MARK E. PETERSON (6)
  · MARK HOFFMAN (12)
  · MARLIN JENSEN (3)
  · MARRIOTT (2)
  · MARTIN HARRIS (4)
  · MASONS (16)
  · MELCHIZEDEK/AARONIC PRIESTHOOD (8)
  · MERRILL J. BATEMAN (2)
  · MICHAEL R. ASH - SECTION 1 (23)
  · MISSIONARIES - SECTION 1 (25)
  · MISSIONARIES - SECTION 2 (25)
  · MISSIONARIES - SECTION 3 (25)
  · MISSIONARIES - SECTION 4 (25)
  · MISSIONARIES - SECTION 5 (17)
  · MISSIONARIES - SECTION 6 (16)
  · MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 1 (24)
  · MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 2 (21)
  · MITT ROMNEY - SECTION 3 (18)
  · MORE GOOD FOUNDATION (1)
  · MORMON CELEBRITIES (14)
  · MORMON CHURCH HISTORY (8)
  · MORMON CHURCH PR (13)
  · MORMON CLASSES (1)
  · MORMON DOCTRINE (33)
  · MORMON FUNERALS (12)
  · MORMON GARMENTS - SECTION 1 (20)
  · MORMON HANDCARTS (10)
  · MORMON INTERPRETER (2)
  · MORMON MARRIAGE EXCLUSIONS (1)
  · MORMON MEMBERSHIP (38)
  · MORMON MONEY - SECTION 1 (25)
  · MORMON MONEY - SECTION 2 (25)
  · MORMON MONEY - SECTION 3 (18)
  · MORMON NEWSROOM (5)
  · MORMON POLITICAL ISSUES (5)
  · MORMON RACISM (18)
  · MORMON TEMPLE CEREMONIES (38)
  · MORMON TEMPLE CHANGES (15)
  · MORMON TEMPLES - SECTION 1 (25)
  · MORMON TEMPLES - SECTION 2 (25)
  · MORMON TEMPLES - SECTION 3 (25)
  · MORMON TEMPLES - SECTION 4 (38)
  · MORMON VISITOR CENTERS (9)
  · MORMON WARDS AND STAKE CENTERS (1)
  · MORMONS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (0)
  · MORMONTHINK (14)
  · MOUNTAIN MEADOWS MASSACRE (20)
  · MURPHY TRANSCRIPT (1)
  · NATALIE R. COLLINS (11)
  · NAUVOO (3)
  · NAUVOO EXPOSITOR (1)
  · NEAL A. MAXWELL - SECTION 1 (1)
  · NEAL A. MAXWELL INSTITUTE (1)
  · NEIL L. ANDERSEN - SECTION 1 (3)
  · OBEDIENCE - PAY, PRAY, OBEY (15)
  · OBJECT LESSONS (15)
  · OLIVER COWDREY (6)
  · ORRIN HATCH (5)
  · PARLEY P. PRATT (11)
  · PATRIARCHAL BLESSING (5)
  · PAUL H. DUNN (5)
  · PBS DOCUMENTARY THE MORMONS (17)
  · PERSECUTION (9)
  · PIONEER DAY (3)
  · PLAN OF SALVATION (4)
  · POLYGAMY - SECTION 1 (26)
  · POLYGAMY - SECTION 2 (24)
  · POLYGAMY - SECTION 3 (15)
  · PRIESTHOOD BLESSINGS (1)
  · PRIMARY (1)
  · PROCLAMATIONS (1)
  · PROPOSITION 8 (21)
  · PROPOSITION 8 COMMENTS (11)
  · QUENTIN L. COOK (10)
  · RELIEF SOCIETY (14)
  · RESIGNATION PROCESS (24)
  · RICHARD G. HINCKLEY (2)
  · RICHARD G. SCOTT (7)
  · RICHARD LYMAN BUSHMAN (11)
  · RICHARD TURLEY (1)
  · ROBERT D. HALES (5)
  · ROBERT L. MILLET (6)
  · RODNEY L. MELDRUM (12)
  · ROYAL SKOUSEN (2)
  · RUNTU'S RINCON (73)
  · RUSSELL M. NELSON (13)
  · SACRAMENT MEETING (11)
  · SALT LAKE TRIBUNE (1)
  · SCOTT D. WHITING (1)
  · SCOTT GORDON (4)
  · SEMINARY (5)
  · SERVICE AND CHARITY (25)
  · SHERI L. DEW (1)
  · SHIELDS RESEARCH - MORMON APOLOGETICS (4)
  · SIDNEY RIGDON (7)
  · SIMON SOUTHERTON (33)
  · SPALDING MANUSCRIPT (6)
  · SPENCER W. KIMBALL (10)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 1 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 10 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 11 (27)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 12 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 13 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 14 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 15 (12)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 2 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 3 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 4 (26)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 5 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 6 (26)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 7 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 8 (25)
  · STEVE BENSON - SECTION 9 (25)
  · STORIES - SECTION 1 (1)
  · SUNSTONE FOUNDATION (2)
  · SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) (11)
  · TAD R. CALLISTER (1)
  · TAL BACHMAN - SECTION 1 (25)
  · TAL BACHMAN - SECTION 2 (25)
  · TAL BACHMAN - SECTION 3 (25)
  · TAL BACHMAN - SECTION 4 (25)
  · TAL BACHMAN - SECTION 5 (25)
  · TAL BACHMAN - SECTION 6 (25)
  · TAL BACHMAN - SECTION 7 (7)
  · TALKS - SECTION 1 (1)
  · TEMPLE WEDDINGS (6)
  · TEMPLES - NAMES (1)
  · TERRYL GIVENS (1)
  · THE PEARL OF GREAT PRICE (1)
  · THE SINGLE WARDS (3)
  · THOMAS S. MONSON - SECTION 1 (29)
  · TIME (4)
  · TITHING - SECTION 1 (25)
  · TITHING - SECTION 2 (25)
  · TITHING - SECTION 3 (7)
  · UGO PEREGO (3)
  · UNNANOUNCED, UNINVITED AND UNWELCOME (35)
  · UTAH LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRY (3)
  · VALERIE HUDSON (3)
  · VAN HALE (16)
  · VAUGHN J. FEATHERSTONE (1)
  · VIDEOS (30)
  · WARD CLEANING (3)
  · WARREN SNOW (1)
  · WELFARE - SECTION 1 (0)
  · WENDY L. WATSON (4)
  · WHITE AND DELIGHTSOME (11)
  · WILFORD WOODRUFF (6)
  · WILLIAM HAMBLIN (8)
  · WILLIAM LAW (1)
  · WILLIAM SCHRYVER (5)
  · WILLIAM WINES PHELPS (3)
  · WOMEN AND MORMONISM - SECTION 1 (24)
  · WOMEN AND MORMONISM - SECTION 2 (25)
  · WOMEN AND MORMONISM - SECTION 3 (36)
  · WORD OF WISDOM (7)
Copyright And Info
Articles posted here are © by their respective owners when designated.

Website © 2005-2013

Compiled With: Caligra 1.121

HOSTED BY



AVOBASE

AvoBase is a light-weight robust point of sale software tool.

If you sell Avon, Stampin-Up, Scentsy, Mary-Kay? AvoBase is for you.

AvoBase can sell from any of them - and even sell from ALL of them at the same time.

And not just Avon, AvoBase can sell nearly ANYTHING.

Sell your product, track your customers and your taxes - all in one easy to use application.

Download FREE today at AvoBase.com.