Return To Main Menu





 Main Menu:


   MAIN

   TOPICS

   FILES

   FORUMS

   MC FAQ

   BOOKS

   LINKS




 Contacts:


Email Infymus

Submit An Article To The Mormon Curtain

Submit Hate Mail




 Mormon Curtain
 Forums:



Forum Index

Announcements

Open Mormon Recovery Forum

Registered Mormon Recovery Forum

Resignation Forum

Recovery Group Meetings

Books And Literature

General Social Discussion

Ex-Mormon Get Together

Advertisements

Off Topic



Google
Search The
Mormon Curtain




WWW
Mormon Curtain




 Archived Topics:


Topic Index

AFFIRMATION - Gay And Lesbian Mormons

APOLOGISTS

BAPTISM FOR THE DEAD

BLOGGERS

BOB MCCUE

BOOK OF ABRAHAM

BOOK OF MORMON

BOOK OF MORMON GEOGRAPHY

BOOKS AND PUBLISHING

BOY SCOUTS

BOYD K. PACKER

BRIGHAM YOUNG

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY

BRUCE R. MCCONKIE

CALLINGS

CATHOLIC CHURCH

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE

COMEDY

COMMUNITY OF CHRIST (RLDS) CHURCH

DALLIN H. OAKS

DANIEL C. PETERSON

DAVID A. BEDNAR

DESERET NEWS

DNA

DOCTRINE AND COVENANTS

ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine

EX-MORMON FOUNDATION

EX-MORMONISM SECTION 1

EX-MORMONISM SECTION 2

EX-MORMONISM SECTION 3

EXCOMMUNICATION

EZRA TAFT BENSON

FACIAL HAIR

FAIR APOLOGETICS

FAITH PROMOTING RUMORS

FARKIN

FARMS APOLOGETICS

FIRST VISION

GARMENTS

GENERAL AUTHORITIES

GENERAL NEWS

GORDON B. HINCKLEY

GRANT PALMER

HATE MAIL RECEIVED ON MORMONCURTAIN

HEBER C. KIMBALL

HENRY B. EYRING

HOLIDAYS

HOME TEACHING AND VISITING TEACHING

HOMOSEXUALITY IN MORMONISM

HOWARD W. HUNTER

HUGH NIBLEY

INFYMUS

JAMES E. FAUST

JEFF LINDSAY

JEFFERY R. HOLLAND

JOSEPH SMITH

KIM CLARK

KINDERHOOK PLATES

KIRTLAND BANK

L. TOM PERRY

LAMANITES

LDS CHURCH

LDS CHURCH OFFICE BUILDING

LYNN A. MICKELSEN

M. RUSSELL BALLARD

MARK HOFFMAN

MASONS

MELCHIZEDEK PRIESTHOOD

MERRILL J. BATEMAN

MISSIONARIES

MITT ROMNEY

MORMON CURTAIN

MORMON MEMBERSHIP

MORMON MONEY

MORMON RACISM

MORMON TRUTH

MOUNTAIN MEADOWS MASSACRE

NATALIE R. COLLINS

NAUVOO

OBEDIENCE - PAY, PRAY, OBEY

OLIVER COWDREY

ORRIN HATCH

PARLEY P. PRATT

PAUL H. DUNN

PLAN OF SALVATION

PODCASTS

POLYGAMY

PRIMARY

RELIEF SOCIETY

RESIGNATION PROCESS

RICHARD G. SCOTT

RICHARD LYMAN BUSHMAN

ROBERT KIRBY

RUSSELL M. NELSON

SACRAMENT MEETING

SALT LAKE TRIBUNE

SHIELDS-RESEARCH

SIMON SOUTHERTON

SPALDING MANUSCRIPT

SPENCER W. KIMBALL

STEVE BENSON

STRENGTHENING CHURCH MEMBERS COMMITTEE (SCMC)

SUNSTONE FOUNDATION

TAL BACHMAN

TEMPLE CEREMONIES

TEMPLE CHANGES

TEMPLES

THOMAS S. MONSON

TITHING

UNNANOUNCED, UNINVITED AND UNWELCOME

VAN HALE

WHITE AND DELIGHTSOME

WOMEN AND THEIR ROLES IN MORMONISM

WORD OF WISDOM





 

 · Blogging the Ex-Mormon And Mormon World - by Infymus.
 · News, Recovery, Information, Humor & More.

  · Containing 1,432 Articles Spanning 114 Topics - Online since January 1, 2005

PLEASE NOTE: If you have reached this page from an outside source such as an Internet Search or forum referral, please note that this page (the one you just landed on) is an archive containing articles on "ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine". This website, The Mormon Curtain - is a website that blogs the Ex-Mormon world. You can read The Mormon Curtain FAQ to understand the purpose of this website.

 CLICK HERE to visit the main page of The Mormon Curtain.

 

 
ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
Total Topics: 13

 
Articles surrounding the LDS Church published magazine The Ensign.
 

Click here for all articles published under this topic.
February Ensign: Dead Sea Scrolls "Prove" Smith And Show A Lost Ancient LDS Community?
Posted Jan 26, 2006, at 11:22 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: Noggin
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
I am confused by this article written by Mr. Skinner in the February Ensign. He takes the dead sea scrolls and actually stretches them to fit the Mormon world view. No one else outside of Mormonism would think to do this. I should really go to WWW.ISLAM.COM and see how Muslims spin the Dead Sea Scrolls to "prove" Islam to be true... yeah, I should do that!

Any how... the source credit (Mr. Skinner actually posted his real name to his article.. for SHAME!)

http://www.lds.org/churchmagazines/2-2006-Ensign/Feb2006Ensign.pdf

Dead Sea Scrolls Support Joseph Smith
"...One notable difference among the scrolls points us to
Joseph Smith. The Prophet Joseph Smith’s claim to have
translated the Book of Mormon from metal plates was
given significant credibility by the discovery of a unique
document at Qumran. Among the many texts unearthed
was the singular find of Cave 3 in 1952—a scroll composed
of a long, thin metal sheet called the Copper Scroll. This
was one of the first texts to be uncovered by professional archaeologists and contains a description of buried treasure.5 Although people have looked carefully, no one has
found any of the treasure."


I know that Smith was lampooned for his gold plates but this is not jiving. What does one long thing metal sheet scroll have to do with Smith's claims?

Those who lived at Qumran were temple covenanting people... JUST LIKE US
The basic ideal for the covenant makers at Qumran was to
live as though they were in the midst of the temple itself every minute of every day.10 They sought to make their isolated community a virtual open-air temple and often wore white linen robes to symbolize the level of purity they sought to attain. Some beliefs and practices described in the scrolls could suggest either a pre-Christian era “gospel” community at Qumran or a long-lost group of ancient Latter-day Saints with their emphasis on consecration, temple-worthy behavior, a strict probationary period before full membership, a hierarchical priesthood organization, an expanded body of scripture, the apostate condition of the world, the term "Saints" applied to all covenant members, new ordinances and religious festivals


What does this really prove in terms of Mormonism though? A long lost group of ancient Mormons? Come on, Skinner.

Skinner's inner machinations:

Let's end this stretched article of mine on the Dead Sea Scrolls testifying of Joseph Smith some how... okay here goes:


"...that LDS doctrines and practices paralleling some of the ideas found in the Dead Sea Scrolls were in fact brought forth by Joseph Smith long before the discovery of those ancient documents. The witness of the Holy Ghost and the study of latterday revelation teach us that Joseph Smith was not simply a lucky forecaster. He was the Lord’s prophet..."

Why does it always have to be tied back to Joseph Smith when no rational scholar outside of Mormonism would even remotely do this?

Is this merely an example of scholarly thought inbreeding caught in a warping spin cycle?
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
God Loves Clam Chowder More Than Anything!
Posted Dec 9, 2005, at 09:49 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: BeenThereDunnThatExMo
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
According to the 12/05 Ensign's "The Clam Chowder Story", written by Gary B. Lundberg, Edgemont 14th Ward, Provo Utah Edgemont Stake, miraculous things are awaiting us all just for the asking.

Seems that god/jesus loves and/or prefers a "good" bowl of Clam Chowder as much as the next guy and a whole helluva lot more than the 30,000 innocent little children that he let die horrible deaths TODAY on this planet due to starvation, disease etc.

Do TBM's really buy this tripe hook, line & sinker??? This story and its author are a colossal insult to humanity...along with the entire cast and crew of LDS Inc.

If I was Gary B. Lundberg of the Edgemont 14th Ward, Provo Utah Edgemont Stake, I'd be out buying the latest Lottery ticket...and I mean and fast!

Now ask me how I really feel...
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
The December 2005 Ensign First Presidency Message, Written By President Hinckley, Is Essentially A Repeat Of An April 1977 General Conference Address.
Posted Dec 6, 2005, at 08:44 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: Justin Butterfield
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
The December 2005 Ensign First Presidency message, written by President Hinckley, is essentially a repeat of an April 1977 General Conference address.

However, there are some changes of note. For instance, in keeping with recent trends, the term "Mormon" is replaced with "Latter-day Saint" and "genealogy" is replaced by "family history." References to specific corporations (IBM and Xerox) have been deleted, statistics have been updated or revised (e.g., the 1977 talk incorrectly referred to 3000 church members in 1830; the 2005 message refers to a more accurate figure of 300), a description of General Conference visitors gathered in the Tabernacle from across the world has been altered, and a description of the location of Illinois Governor Thomas Ford's grave has been deleted.

A stark assertion in the 1977 talk that, "In no conceivable way could [the Word of Wisdom] have come of the dietary literature of the time, nor from the mind of the man who announced it," however, was left unchanged. (Scholarship of the last thirty years has come to more modest conclusions on this issue [see here and here]).

For the purpose of comparison, I have adopted the 1977 address as the baseline text. Additions to the 1977 message are noted in bold. Deletions are noted with strikethroughs. Minor stylistic and punctuation changes are not noted (e.g., 30 vs. thirty).

Joseph the Seer Smith Jr.—Prophet of God, Mighty Servant

My brethren and sisters, I seek the direction of the Holy Spirit. Many of us have been gratified recently as we have read in periodicals and seen on television some complimentary references to the Church.

For instance, last month one of the large circulation magazines spoke appreciatively of the Mormon way of life, a way which discourages the use of tobacco, alcohol, tea, and coffee and encourages physical fitness. Then a network television broadcast reported on our tremendous genealogical program. There have been other positive accounts dealing with the organizational structure of the Church, with our welfare program, and with the family home evening program.

But largely absent from all of these accounts is any mention of the origin of these practices, or the reasons for them.

Further, some recent publications carry the thesis that there is nothing of the hand of Divinity in the establishment and development of the Church; that this has been only a natural response to contemporary social conditions.


An acquaintance said to me one day: "I admire your church very much. I think I could accept everything about it—except Joseph Smith." To which I responded: "That statement is a contradiction. If you accept the revelation, you must accept the revelator."

It is a constantly recurring mystery to me how some people speak with admiration for the Church and its work, while at the same time disdaining him through whom, as a servant of the Lord, came the framework of all that the Church is, of all that it teaches, and of all that it stands for. They would pluck the fruit from the tree while cutting off the root from which it grows.

The so-called Mormon code of health, code of health followed by Latter-day Saints, which is so widely praised in these days of cancer and heart research, is in reality a revelation given to Joseph Smith in 1833 as a "Word of Wisdom" from the Lord (see D&C; 89:1). In no conceivable way could it have come of the dietary literature of the time, nor from the mind of the man who announced it. Today, in terms of medical research, it is a miracle, whose observance has saved incalculable suffering and premature death for uncounted tens of thousands.

Genealogical Family history research is suddenly becoming has become a popular hobby as a result of Alex Haley’s book Roots in recent years. Thousands of eyes across the world have been turned to what is described as the Mormon treasure house of genealogical Latter-day Saint treasure-house of family history data. But this tremendous program of the Church did not result from the pursuit of a hobby. It is an extension of the teachings of Joseph Smith, the Mormon prophet the Prophet. He declared that we cannot be saved without our forebears, those who did not have a knowledge of the gospel and consequently could not fulfill its requirements nor partake of its opportunities (see D&C; 128:9, 15).

The remarkable organization of the Church, which has received much attention, was framed by him as he was directed by revelation, and no modification or adaptation of that organization is ever considered without searching the revelations set forth by the Prophet.

Even the welfare program, which some are prone to regard as of rather recent origin, is founded and operated strictly upon principles enunciated by Joseph Smith in the early years of the Church. This is likewise true of the family home evening program, which is no more than an extension of early revelation on the responsibility of parents to bring up their children in "light and truth." "to bring up your children in light and truth" (D&C; 93:40).

Proclaiming a Prophet

Not long ago, Once while riding in a plane, I engaged in conversation with a young man who was seated beside me. We moved from one subject to another, and then came to the matter of religion. He said that he had read considerably about the Mormons, Latter-day Saints, that he had found much to admire in their practices, but that he had a definite prejudice concerning the story of the origin of the Church and particularly Joseph Smith. He was an active member of another organization, and when I asked where he had acquired his information, he indicated that it had come from publications of his church. I asked what company he worked for. He proudly replied that he was a sales representative for IBM an international computer company. I then asked whether he would think it fair for his customers to learn of the qualities of IBM its products from a Xerox representative of its leading competitor. He replied with a smile, "I think I get the point of what you’re trying to say."

I took from my case a copy of the Doctrine and Covenants and read to him the words of the Lord expressed through Joseph Smith, words which are the source of those practices my friend had come to admire in us while disdaining the man through whom they had come. Before we parted, he agreed to read the literature I would send to him. I promised him that if he would do so prayerfully he would know the truth not only of these doctrines and practices which have had interested him, but also of the man through whom they were introduced. I then gave him my testimony of my conviction concerning the prophetic calling of Joseph Smith. That baby boy born 200 years ago this month in humble circumstances in rural Vermont was foreordained to become a great leader in the fulfilling of our Father's plan for His children on earth.

We do not worship the Prophet. We worship God our Eternal Father, and the risen Lord Jesus Christ. But we acknowledge him, the Prophet; we proclaim him; we respect him; we reverence him as an instrument in the hands of the Almighty in restoring to the earth the ancient truths of the divine gospel, together with the priesthood through which the authority of God is exercised in the affairs of his church His Church and for the blessing of his His people.

The story of Joseph's life is the story of a miracle. He was born in poverty. He was reared in adversity. He was driven from place to place, falsely accused, and illegally imprisoned. He was murdered at the age of 38. Yet in the brief space of 20 years preceding his death, he accomplished what none other has accomplished in an entire lifetime. He translated and published the Book of Mormon, a volume of 522 pages which has since been retranslated into more than a score scores of languages and which is accepted by millions across the earth as the word of God. The revelations he received and other writings he produced are likewise scripture to these millions. The total in book pages constitutes the equivalent of almost the entire Old approximately twice the volume of the entire New Testament of the Bible, and it all came through one man in the space of a few years.

In this same period he established an organization which for almost a century and a half 175 years has withstood every adversity and challenge, and is as effective today in governing a worldwide membership of more than three and a half some 12 million as it was 145 years ago in governing a membership of three thousand 300 in 1830. There are those doubters who have strained to explain this remarkable organization as the product of the times in which he lived. That organization, I submit, was as peculiar, as unique, and as remarkable then as it is today. It was not a product of the times. It came as a revelation from God.

Immortality and Eternity

Joseph Smith's vision of man's immortal nature reached from an existence before birth to the eternities beyond the grave. He taught that salvation is universal in that all men will become the beneficiaries of the resurrection Resurrection through the atonement Atonement wrought by the Savior. But beyond this gift is the requirement of obedience to the principles of the gospel and the promise of consequent happiness in this life and exaltation in the life to come.

Nor was the gospel he taught limited in application to those of his own and future generations. The mind of Joseph Smith, tutored by the God of heaven, encompassed all mankind of all generations. Both the living and the dead must have the opportunity to partake of gospel ordinances.

Peter of old declared: "For this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit" (1 Peter 4:6). In the case of the dead there must be vicarious work if they are to be judged according to men in the flesh, and in order to accomplish this, they must be identified; hence the great genealogical family history program of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It was not established to satisfy the interests of a hobby, but to accomplish the eternal purposes of God.

Within the space of that 20 years preceding his death, Joseph Smith set in motion a program for carrying the gospel to the nations of the earth. I marvel at the boldness with which he moved. Even in the infant days of the Church, in times of dark adversity, men were called to leave homes and families, to cross the sea, to proclaim the restoration Restoration of the gospel of Jesus Christ. His The Prophet's mind, his vision encompassed the entire earth.

Seated in this hall today are those from For our general conference meetings twice each year, members gather in North, Central, and South America; from in the British Isles and Africa; from in the nations of Europe; from in the islands and continents of the Pacific; and from in the ancient lands of Asia. You who have come from far and near, you These are the flowering of the vision of Joseph Smith, the prophet of God. He was indeed a mighty seer, who saw this day and greater days yet to come as the work of the Lord moves over the earth.

This magnificent flowering would amaze those men with painted faces who, in a cowardly attack, shot and killed the defenseless Prophet that sultry June day in 1844. It would amaze Governor Thomas Ford of the state of Illinois, who had pledged to protect the Prophet and then had left him to the mercy of the merciless mob. It was this same Thomas Ford who concluded in his History history that Joseph Smith "never could succeed in establishing a system of policy which looked to permanent success in the future." (Thomas Ford, A History of Illinois..., quoted in B. H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of the Church, 2:347).

It is this same Thomas Ford who today lies buried in a secluded section of the cemetery in Peoria, Illinois, largely forgotten, while the man he had judged a failure is remembered with gratitude over the earth.

Praise to the Man

When I was a boy 12 years of age, my father took me to a meeting of the priesthood of the stake in which we lived. I sat on the back row while he, as president of the stake, sat on the stand. At the opening of that meeting, the first of its kind I had ever attended, 300 or 400 men stood. They were men from varied backgrounds and many vocations, but each had in his heart the same conviction, out of which together they sang these great words:

Praise to the man who communed with Jehovah!
Jesus anointed that Prophet and Seer.
Blessed to open the last dispensation,
Kings shall extol him, and nations revere.
(Hymns, no. 147.) ("Praise to the Man," Hymns, no. 27)

Something happened within me as I heard those men of faith sing. There came into my boyish heart a knowledge, placed there by the Holy Spirit, that Joseph Smith was indeed a prophet of the Almighty. In the many years that have since passed, years in which I have read much of his words and works, that knowledge has grown stronger and ever more certain. Mine has been the privilege of bearing witness across this nation from sea to shining sea, and on continents north and south, east and west, that he was and is a prophet of God, a mighty servant and testifier of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Great is his glory and endless his priesthood.
Ever and ever the keys he will hold.
Faithful and true, he will enter his kingdom,
Crowned in the midst of the prophets of old.
(Hymns, no. 147 27)

That testimony I reaffirm to you this day, as I also affirm that he who presides at this conference is the legal successor to him of whom I have spoken. I know that, and I leave my testimony now, in the name of him Him of whom Joseph Smith was a witness and of whom I also am a witness, even the Lord Jesus Christ.Amen.

http://mormonwasp.blogspot.com/2005/1...
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
December 2005 Ensign-- "Merry Smithmas!" Are You Kidding Me!?
Posted Nov 28, 2005, at 09:30 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
So, in our mailbox we get the latest issue of the Ensign. (Only one more month of it before our subscription expires. Yay!)

To our absolute shock and disgust, the cover, on the December issue that really should be all about Jesus CHrist, is a cover of Joseph Smith, knealing in the Sacred Grove.

Are you serious!?

My husband and I have only stepped away from the church in the past 4 months, and we're still in shock that we didn't notice this favoritism of Jo Smitty until recently.

Yes, it's Smitty's 200th birthday on the 23rd.... i get it-- but man, it's also -- more importantly-- the season we celebrate Christmas. That should have been the cover-- and the article about Christmas doesn't even hit until page 22-- and there are no pictures of Christ in the article. A few pages later there are some paintings of Christ's life.

How could I have been so blind.

I wanted to call my whole family and point this out-- oh well.

Let them enjoy their Smithmas.
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
Subliminal Tithing Message In This Months Ensign?
Posted Sep 7, 2005, at 08:04 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
Anyone notice the picture in this month's Ensign showing a member filling out a contribution slip? The picture shows a close-up of the slip designating $325 in tithing and another $175 in fast offering and other contributions (missionary fund, PEF), for a total contribution of $500 (the picture also shows the member's personal check written out for $500).

Now, presuming the member is paying a 10% tithe on gross income for that period, this means the member made $3,250. Thus, the member's total payment of $500 to the Church is over 15% of that member's gross income (and would be an even higher percentage of the member's net income presuming that the member brought home much less than $3,250 after taxes, etc.).

Hmm ... the details of that picture (showing the exact figures of income and contributions) cause me to suspect those numbers were not chosen at random by the photographer. Do you think the Church is trying to send members the message that they ought to be giving well over 10% (and upwards of 15%) to the Church?

- -

Phouchg and Cinnabonbon said it - there are NO subliminal messages about tithing. They hit you over the head with it and this is no exception. The message is clear.

In one of my last TR interviews the bishop (who knew I paid on net, although I never said it) did everything he could to say I should pay on gross without actually saying it. He recounted a conversation he had just had with a GA about it (who said the church will not specify gross over net because of the various ways people earn money, but for salaried folk it is clear - they should pay on gross.) The bishop told a few more anecdotes including one about a financially strapped single mom in the ward (it wasn't hard for me to figure out who he was talking about) who was told to pay tithing on net so she would have more money, and the bishop warned her against it, saying "Sister, the Lord doesn't want your money but he wants your faith - don't succumb to the temptation to pay on net instead of gross!" The bishop then told me that he wanted gross blessings, not net blessings. And lastly he said that he didn't want to get to the judgement seat and find out that he had paid on net instead of gross and that wasgoing to keep him out of the CK.

The whole time I just sat there politely, smiling, knowing what he was doing but not saying a word. He ended up giving me my TR (I needed it since I worked for LDS Inc. at the time.) It was kind of humorous.

My sister told me that her husband was in a meeting once where the speaker said that members should give to fast offerings "until it hurts". My BIL went home and wrote out a check for $5000 and gave it to the bishop for fast offerings. My sister was livid.

There is no subtlety and no subliminal message. The message is quite clear regarding tithing and other donations.

- -

And lastly he said that he didn't want to get to the judgement seat and find out that he had paid on net instead of gross and that was going to keep him out of the CK.

What a wonderful role model of a loving father!

Give me money, or I'll fry your ass.

My own earthly loving father never asked for any money from me, nor did he demand a sacrifice. Instead, he gave money to me and sacrificed for me, never once asking for anything in return.

I now try to emulate his behavior in my relationship with my own children.

Apparently, however, I'm doing it all wrong. As God is the perfect role model, it appears I need to start demanding financial sacrifices from my children. I need to demand a share of the lawn mowing or baby sitting money they earn and then withhold my love from them if they don't give it to me.

Geez, who's to know that I was doing it so wrong for so long?

Thanks God for setting me right.

Isn't it marvelous?

http://www.aimoo.com/forum/postview.c...
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
The Life Of Bathsheba Smith (Abridged)
Posted Jun 28, 2005, at 08:33 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
The July Ensign includes a rather lengthy article on Bathsheba Smith, fourth Relief Society general president. As noted at the end of the article, a longer version of the article appeared as a chapter in the book Elect Ladies, published in 1990. (Elect Ladies is a collection of chapter-length biographical studies of each of the Relief Society general presidents (through Elaine L. Jack).)

I decided to compare the two versions for interest's sake. Certainly the original article simply needed to be shortened for inclusion in the magazine, and I found plenty of examples of condensed material consistent with that very purpose. But what was most striking is the fact that I found a consistent pattern of excising all references to plural marriage found in the original article. What emerges is a distorted picture of Bathsheba Smith's life.

Here is one example: (strikethroughs indicate material found in the original and omitted in the Ensign article; boldface indicates material found only in the Ensign article):
At age eighteen 19, in Nauvoo, Bathsheba earned the distinction of being was among the youngest woman present at the organization of the Relief Society in March 1842. She also attended the laying of the cornerstone of the Nauvoo Temple. In Nauvoo, too, Bathsheba and her husband, George A. Smith, were among the first to receive their temple endowments and to be taught the principle of plural marriage by the Prophet Joseph Smith be sealed together.
The paragraphs below are found in the original but not in the Ensign article:
Bathsheba was one of the first persons to receive the temple endowment in Nauvoo and to hear the Prophet Joseph Smith teach of the celestial order of marriage. In January 1844, a month after Bathsheba and George A. received their endowments, Joseph performed the sealing ceremony for them. She wrote of the effect of the revelation on celestial marriage on her life:

"Being thoroughly convinced . . . that the doctrine of plurality of wives was from God; and having a fixed determination to attain celestial glory, I felt to embrace the whole gospel. . . . Like Sarah of old, I gave to my husband five wives, good virtuous, honorable young women. This gave them all homes, with us; being proud of my husband and loving him very much . . . and believing he would not love them less because he loved me more, I had joy in having a testimony that what I had done was acceptable to my Father in Heaven."

Over the next two years Lucy Meserve, Zilpha Stark, Sarah Ann Libby, Hannah Maria Libby (Sarah's sister), and Nancy Clement were married to George A. Smith, and Bathsheba accepted these women as sisters.
The editing in the following paragraph removes any mention that George A. Smith had plural wives, going so far as to change the word families to family:
In June 1847, many Saints left Winter Quarters for the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were Bathsheba's sisters, her in-laws, and her husband, George A. Bathsheba longed to go with them, but she decided to George and Bathsheba followed a different course. Bathsheba remained at Winter Quarters with the rest of George's wives and children, feeling it her duty to care for them. Even though she wondered later if she should have gone, she did what she thought would be her husband's wish. In all, she spent three years at Winter Quarters to help others while George A. traveled back and forth to the Salt Lake Valley helping other Saints to migrate west.

By late June 1849Two years later, it was finally time for George A. secured enough supplies and a wagon for each of his five to lead his familiesy to move west.
The next passage contained in the original is not found in the Ensign article:
In June 1851, George A.'s wife Sarah died. Her sister Hannah did not get along well with Bathsheba and, after Sarah's funeral, argued with Bathsheba over who would raise Sarah's three-year-old son. As first wife, it was Bathsheba's responsibility to handle the situation. Far more comfortable working with her hands than dealing with challenges such as these, she wrote of the conflict to George A.: "What Hannah will do now I don't know. . . . I could take her home if she would be kind to me, but she will not. I was not very well and my mind was troubled knowing the feelings that existed in our family and Sarah just being dead and everybody looking on, one saying one thing and another thing for every mean thing that could be said had been said. . . . I will try to do the best I hope I can and if I do not write I hope you will tell me how and I will try to do it as I always have."

By August, Bathsheba could write to her husband of resolving the conflict: "I saw Hannah today at meeting, she was as friendly as I have seen her since you left. I hope she will continue to be friendly for I do hate to have anyone cross with me."

George A. returned briefly the next month. The following year, in August 1852, Church leaders asked him to preside over the Saints in the Provo area, some forty miles south of Salt Lake City. He took Hannah and Lucy with him, leaving only Bathsheba in Salt Lake City.
Another passage excised from the original:
In October 1857, George A. Smith took another plural wife, Susan Elizabeth West, and brought her to live with Bathsheba. Bathsheba later wrote of the common interest in home industry she shared with Susan:

"Sister Susan and myself for about ten or twelve years have spun, colored and wove full cloth, flannel, linsey janes, kerseys, blankets, coverlids, shawls, wove fringe, wool carpets, stair carpets, rag carpets, and have spun flax and tow, and wove table linen towels, bed ticks, and made sewing thread. We also carded, spun, and wove cotton, made cotton cloth for diapers, dresses, bedspreads, bed ticks, bags, spun candle wicking, spun and wove table cloths, towels, we knit our own stockings, socks, hoods neckwraps mittens, made netting, embroidery . . . and have done all to encourage home manufactory. We have exhibited many of our homemade goods at our territorial fairs and they always received favorable attention."
Another passage carefully edited from the original:
Still deeply grieving over her son's death, Bathsheba experienced a profound sense of loss when her daughter left home. But she was not alone. Happily for Bathsheba, Julina still lived with her, and she was close to the children of Susan, George A.'s seventh wife. She took a particular interest in Susan's oldest daughter, Clarissa.
I also found an instance of editing that may have been motivated by other content concerns. Bathsheba's thoughts regarding her husband's death are shortened when quoted in the Ensign version, perhaps to avoid offending modern sensibilities regarding equality within marriage or to avoid raising theological questions:
George A. Smith died in September 1875.from complications resulting from an old injury, a lung punctured while he was serving on a mission. Bathsheba wrote of his death: "His head lay . . . against my bosom,. Ggood angels had come to receive his precious spirit, perhaps our sons, prophets, patriarchs. . . but he was gone my light, my sun, my life, my joy my Lord, yea almost my God. . . . I must not mourn but prepare myself to meet him but O my heart sinks within my bosom nearly."
Finally, the Ensign article unfortunately excises mention that Bathsheba was actively involved in the cause of women's suffrage.

http://mormonwasp.blogspot.com/2005/06/life-of-bathsheba-smith-abridged.html
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
July Ensign Article Encourages Members To Contact Those On "Do Not Contact" List
Posted Jun 16, 2005, at 11:03 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
The July Ensign isn't posted yet on LDS.org, but once it is, I'll try and get a link. Basically, the article is about a Bishop who assigned some members in the ward to contact everyone on the "do not contact" list, to try and befriend them again.

The member claimed he was successful in breaking down boundaries with every single person on the do not contact list, except for one family. So, he sent that family a subscription to the church magazines. Lo and behold, a year later, that family who received the magazines eventually "softened their hearts" to the gospel once again.

Moral of the story: If you don't want to be contacted, resign, because the church won't respect "do not contact" lists anymore.

- -

They tried doing that when I was still TBM,lol.

When the RS contacted a woman who had already told them she did not want to be bothered, she let lose such a stream of obscenities over the phone that the good sisters' ears were burning.

Nevertheless, the RS tried to get me to call her again three months later because "everyone had to be contacted at least four times a year". I absolutely refused to do this.

The church is nuts, treating adults like little kids. If a person really wants to be in church, they will have no problem finding out the meeting times.

I think the article is nothing but another faith-promoting propaganda lie.

And to think I used to read the ENSIGN cover to cover each month, never realizing that most of their stories are either outright fiction, or heavily re-worked to tug at the reader's heart-strings.

- -

I was in an Elders Quorum presidency once, and I can remember having a list of about ten families that didn't get assigned to regular home teaching, because they were "somewhat hostile." They got assigned to the Elders Quorum president, and he would call them up once in awhile to reaffirm their desire not to be contacted by religious kooks.

Sometimes he would come back with a report that he had a nice visit with one of them, but the details were sketchy and there were never any follow-up reports.

I seriously doubt that this bishop was able to reach ALL the no-contacts in his ward except for one, and then reached that one with an unwanted Ensign subscription. That's Mormon fantasy land.

We used to get visits from high councilmen all the time in our quorum meetings who would feed us the usual line about how people were inactive because they were "offended." I didn't even believe that then. I would have laughed out loud if I'd been fed this cock and bull bishop story.

I think this article isn't geared for those trying to contact "inactive members" (ex-Mormons). It's to make the general membership think that all is well in Zion and that even unbelievers believe on some level, and that if you're having any doubts, you're the only one.

Click Here For Original Link Or Thread.
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
Cover Story On The June Ensign: Strengthening Future Mothers
Posted Jun 15, 2005, at 10:13 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP

Folks, here is another lovely article just waiting to be dissected by the foyer.  I rarely glance more than a few seconds at the cover of the Ensign, but this one had a photo of a mother showing her daughter how to sew on a button. 

Ensign

Sure that the article would be full of useful tips on how to brainwash your daughters into thinking there is nothing more to life than caring for a house and children, I opened it up.  I was not disappointed.

Here is a link to the entire article:

http://library.lds.org/nxt/gateway.dll?f=templates$fn=default.htm

Sister Susan Tanner enlightens parents and YW leaders on how to make sure these girls know exactly where their place is.  Though the entire article is gag-worthy, here are some of the, *ahem*, finer points:  (my notes are in blue)

The article starts with this:

Several years ago my husband and I asked our children what they liked about the recent general conference. Our then-16-year-old daughter was elated. She said, "I loved it! I loved hearing inspired, intelligent prophets and leaders affirm motherhood." Then she told us that this was one of the disturbing anxieties in her life: "I just don't hear it from anyone?not at seminary, not in Young Women, and definitely not at school; nowhere except at home."

All I have to say, is 'yea, freakin' right'.  As if any 16 year old says:   "I loved hearing inspired, intelligent prophets and leaders affirm motherhood." 

It goes on:

....I talked with a group of about 20 Laurels whom I had never met before. I asked them what their goals were. The first few mentioned educational goals such as getting a PhD; some said they would like to go on a mission?all worthy goals. Finally one girl timidly expressed the desire to be a mother. Then a few more girls talked about other goals. After one more girl mentioned motherhood, the rest of them joined in. But it was quite courageous for those first two girls to admit they wanted to be mothers.

Note how she brushed over the fact that some girls wanted an advanced education.  "It's a worthy goal, but I want you to be like me and be a mother so that is what I'm going to talk about", is what she is really saying.

Here are her bullet points:

1.  We must teach young women how to strengthen their current homes and families

Several of our general board members grew up in homes with parents who were less active in the Church. One of them had a wise Young Women leader who counseled her to be with her family when they did recreational things on Sunday but to maintain her personal standards. So if they went to a swimming club, she would go with them to visit with them, but she herself would not go swimming. She was able to build a tender relationship with her family.

2.  We must prepare young women with skills, both temporal and spiritual, that will bless their future homes

(note how educational skills is not listed....)

Homemaking skills are becoming a lost art. I worry about this. When we lose the homemakers in a society, we create an emotional homelessness much like street homelessness, with similar problems of despair, drugs, immorality, and lack of self-worth....

So we must teach homemaking skills, including practical ones such as cooking, sewing, budgeting, and beautifying. We must let young women know that homemaking skills are honorable and can help them spiritually as well as temporally. Making a home appealing physically will encourage loved ones to want to be there and will help create the kind of atmosphere that is conducive to the Spirit.

3. We must inspire young women to want to be wonderful wives, mothers, and homemakers.

My best and most consistent example in learning the joys of homemaking and mothering was my own mother. She told me many times every day how much she treasured being a mother and homemaker, and then she lived those words in every action. She sang as she folded laundry; she exulted over the clean smell in a freshly scrubbed bathroom; she taught me how to read and write, sew and cook, love and serve. Because she emanated the Spirit and the fruits of love, joy, peace, meekness, long-suffering, and temperance, I felt it, and I knew I wanted the same things in my life.

4. We must help young women have the courage to face a world that is desecrating families and family values.

It has been alarming recently to feel the full fury of Satan's attack on families. Alternative lifestyles, abortion, cohabitation, divorce, immorality, and violence are issues that are screaming in our faces at every turn....

I feel faith in Jesus Christ and in His restored gospel upon the earth. I feel empowered by the truths of the gospel succinctly stated in the proclamation on the family. It takes a stand on each of the issues I just mentioned, as well as others.

(See, the thinking has been done, I don't have to do some hard thinking about some of life's complex issues.  I just love the gospel!)

5. We must emphasize to young women the eternal responsibility and privilege of motherhood and help them understand that each of them will make a home and influence children, whether or not they have the opportunity to have children in this life.

President Spencer W. Kimball (1895-1985) talked about the influence of strong women of God upon the world: "Much of the major growth that is coming to the Church in the last days will come because many of the good women of the world (in whom there is often such an inner sense of spirituality) will be drawn to the Church in large numbers. This will happen to the degree that the women of the Church reflect righteousness and articulateness in their lives and to the degree that the women of the Church are seen as distinct and different?in happy ways?from the women of the world."

We are distinct and different in happy ways because we know who we are eternally. We are all divinely appointed to these womanly roles of mothering and nurturing....

How significant are our roles as parents! How crucial are our roles as leaders! How imperative that we properly train the future righteous women of God!

 

Okay, so I have to say that she forgot one major bullet point:

6.  Young Women:  When you get to be 25 years old and have 4 little ones and feel overwhelmed with your calling and the financial problems you have because your husband is still in school and you have no health insurance and diapers cost too much... I have a little secret:  Prozac.  It's God's drug and it will make you forget about your problems.  It will help you raise up your children in the church so their salvation won't be lost.  YW leaders and parents:  let your girls know that after they have served everyone else in their life: their husband, their children, their ward.. then they can serve themselves... that is if they have any energy or self-esteem left.

The photos in the article are the following:

1.  A YW smilingwhile putting a pot roast together while the family gazes on adoringly. 

2.  A YW smiling while she irons something under the watchful eyes of two women who appear to be her YW leaders.

3.  A YW smiling as she arranges a vase of flowers with the help of a woman.

4.  A smiling YW with a full grocery handbasket and a list being pointed at by a woman.

5.  A smiling YW holding up something she has just finished sewing.  A woman and another girl look at her finished project with great adoration.  Interestingly , it looks like she is holding up a homemade temple 'leaf' apron.  (See pg. 23 of the magazine.)

6.  And finally... it wouldn't be a proper article without a smiling YW reading a Book of Mormon.

 

Sorry, but this article just pushed some of my buttons.  Makes me glad I won't be parroting this shit to my daughters.

Click Here For Original Link Or Thread.
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
General Conference Report - I Have Seen A Sign
Posted May 27, 2005, at 10:10 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
Editor note: This made me chuckle. - Infymus.

I was getting dressed this morning when I noticed a copy of the conference Ensign by the bed. By the bed, but unopened - a sure sign of a TBM in the house. The front cover showed a bored looking Joseph Smith at an incredibly boring looking meeting in the Peter Whitmer house. The picture seemed designed to rewrite history, Orwell style, as if saying "see, the early church was just as boring as today." What a depressing cover! I wondered what the rest of the magazine was like. Nervously, I opened the magazine.

Inside front cover: smiling, happy First Presidency in their palatial mansion. But what's this? The white ghost of Joseph Smith hovering behind them - it looked like a still from Scooby Doo. Intrigued, I opened the pages at random to find a talk. The first talk I saw (page 46, by Elder Andersen) was entitled "Beware the evil behind the smiling eyes." I turned back to the inside front cover. Three kindly old men with smiling eyes. Joseph Smith standing behind them. "Beware the evil behind the smiling eyes!" Is this a sign?

I was tempted to read the rest of the magazine, but the Big Brother picture on page 5 spooked me, then the talks entitled "Tithing - a a Commandment Even for the Destitute" and "The Fruits of the First Vision" made me remember why I am no longer a member. I turned to the Sunday Morning session for confirmation. First talk: "What Seek Ye?" Second Talk: "Pornography." I have seen enough. The magazine was closed. Truly, it is a sign.

Click Here For Original Link Or Thread.
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
Is The Ensign The Most Boring Church Magazine In All Religiondom?
Posted May 16, 2005, at 06:38 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
Fifty years ago, church magazines were frequently interesting, I think because they were far loonier. I almost began longing for those days while I was coming down the home stretch. I thought there was something wrong with me in always fighting back the thought that there appeared to be virtually nothing of relevance to my life in any church magazine anymore. But I think I would have even settled for something not totally boring.

Fifty years ago, The Ensign featured "Answers to Gospel Questions" with apostle Joseph Fielding Smith subtly insulting entire High Priests Groups because they hadn't managed to figure out that - OF COURSE - earth had been catapulted out of the presence of the star Kolob when Adam, "the sole progenitor of the whole human race", fell or whatever. (I especially got a kick out of Elder Smith's work on the age of the earth, and his explanations of the cave men). I mean, at least this kind of stuff was entertaining. (The problem with the "entertainment" argument, though, is that you could defend even the most horrific events on grounds that they were "entertaining" as in attention-grabbing and maintaining - like WWII or a car crash or something.) So, maybe the lunacy wasn't worth it...

Modern church magazines are, by contrast, usually very boring. This is quite a feat for the magazine of a church started by the irrepressible and creative (and sometime militia leader) Joseph Smith, who was one of the least boring individuals in American religious history, right up there with Jimmy Swaggart, David Koresh, Sri Bagwan Rajneesh, and Jim Jones. I actually think he'd throw a modern Ensign right into the trash and totally revamp the whole thing. In his own words, he became rather addicted to excitement. I think he would disdain such a boring thing.

The Ensign is almost unreadable, precisely because what Mormonism is - or at least, what it presents itself as consisting of - continues to shrink in the direction of the mainstream. There is a sensivity to the external culture which simply was not present fifty or seventy years ago; and in some ways, it almost seems like there is a slowly growing consciousness within the church, of the distant hum of profound trouble vis-a-vis the church's foundational claims, which inhibits speech and speculation. But nothing potentially controversial means nothing very thought-provoking or interesting.

So, as it stands right now, in-flight magazines strike me as far more riveting than The Ensign. Flying on American you can read about some guy who sold everything, moved to Tuscany, started his own vineyard and after near bankruptcy, made loads of money; or about some lady who went to the Pamplona bull run and watched a couple of drunken gallegos get gored to death. At least that's something.

But then, you open up an Ensign and struggle to get through some bland article about how much Jesus loved children by some Japanese Seventy you've never heard of, which reads like it was written by the same computer software program which writes every other one of those seventy's pieces; and then struggle against blackout slogging through another watching-paint-dry bunch of mindless stories totally irrelevant to how we should live our lives from Thomas Monson, and then some rah-rah propaganda about how they just formed a brand new stake in Portugal somewhere, which doesn't mention that the "new stake" was actually the product of a reduction in the number of Portugese stakes. In-flight American magazine lesson: dare to live boldly, but not so boldly that you get killed. Ensign lesson: the gospel, on its surface anyway, consists mostly of boring, flattering platitudes and cliches inferior to those you could find on any Hallmark Card, and for those hearers/readers of even minimal mental function, the expositionof which - supposedly, by men appointed by the indisputably charismatic, iconoclastic, spellbinding, provocative Jesus of Nazareth - is increasingly so banal as to constitute a kind of penance.

If the church isn't true, can't its official magazine at least be entertaining or interesting? What's wrong with these people? Just because you're not really being directed by Jesus doesn't mean your magazines have to be so lame. It's like reading "Highlights" at your dentist's office. Don't they know?

Click Here For Original Link Or Thread.
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
More White Washed Mormon History - Ensign May 2005
Posted May 3, 2005, at 07:44 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
The front cover of the May Ensign is of GQ Joseph organizing his church. The problem is, It shows the women voting. Is it not true, that women did not sustain in the church until several years later? As a matter of fact, in a Solemn Assembly, Was it not Gordon B. Hinkley who was the first prophet that women actually had a vote? This, of course, would be a problem to have to explain to non members.

Hell, if you're gonna repaint Joseph's appearance, you might as well paint the women's arms up in the air I suppose.

By the way, is that Fanny Alger in the front row? It must be, because they painted Joseph's eye's NOT ogling her.

The article about N.K. Whitney went through the sacrifices he made for the church and for JS. How he sold his store, etc.

What sacrifice didn't the article mention? That N.K. Whitney gave his seventeen-year-old daughter to Joseph Smith as a wife.

Click Here For Original Link Or Thread.
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
My "sin"-born Baby More Likely To Die Of SIDS: Thanks Ensign
Posted Mar 15, 2005, at 08:54 AM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
Editor Note: This kind of bullshit just pisses me off. Where does the church get off writing this kind of crap? Show us the data that states that children born out of wedlock are at a higher risk than married couples. This article from the leaders of the Mormon Church tells us the following:
  • Bearing children out of wedlock is a disgrace.
  • Bearing children out of wedlock is an embarassment.
  • Church wishes to bring back the stigma of nonmarital childbearing.
  • Having a child out of wedlock is a sin.
  • Having a child out of wedlock may cause your baby to die of SIDS.
  • Having a child out of wedlock will cause your child to become a juvenile offender.

- -

If you read my post earlier this week you might remember I am 35, divorced, in a stable relationship and pregnant. I left the church months ago and was trying to decide how to tell TBM friends that I am pregnant, and have left the church.

Well hoily inspiration!! The April Ensign came to prime the pump of judgement and attempt to induce guilt and fear. Leave it to the profit to come just at the right time.

The article, "Multiply and Replenish the Earth" urges people to get married for the purpose of having kids, and says how sad it is that couples these days selfishly think that marriage is for the emotional needs of adults. But it has a heading, "Nonmarital Childbearing." It says:

"...bearing children out of wedlock has traditionally been considered an embarassment and a disgrace. But in today's world, where good is called evil and evil good, the stigma of nonmarital childbearing has largely vanished. Not only is this practice a sin in the eyes of heaven, but researchers have found out-of-wedlock birth to be associated with several risks for the baby. ... children born out of wedlock are more likely to die of sudden infant death syndrome, suffer death due to injury, or eventually become juvenile offenders."

lovely.

- -

There was a post on Feb. 22 by Randy J. on "Joseph Smith's attitude towards sexual relations in polygamy..." in which he quotes a conversation in the 1880s recalling the Prophet's words (to H.C. Kimball): "...one reason why illegitimate children are often so bright and intelligent is because they are begotten in love and unless the children are begotten in love they are not so liable to be so intelligent" (quotation from Stan Larson, ed., "Prisoner For Polygamy: The Memoirs and Letters of Rudger Clawson at the Utah Territorial Penitentiary 1884-1887," p. 12).

This emphasis on the energy involved in conception, regardless of marital status, is good Hermetic philosophy (with which Smith was familiar, according to John L. Brooke's "The Refiner's Fire"). I witnessed a contemporary restatement of this from Norman Mailer, at a college gathering in 1971, when he commented on the superior vitality and robustness of illegitimate children conceived in passion: "A good f--- makes a good child."

- -

Credits: kc, Blue Clouds Click Here For Original Link Or Thread.
 
Click here for all articles published under this topic.
Why Mormons Can't Just Be "friends"
Posted Feb 7, 2005, at 12:13 PM.
FILED UNDER: ENSIGN - Church Published Magazine
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: n/a
ARCHIVED BY: Infymus

TOP
In the February 2005 issue of the LDS Church magazine, the "Ensign", the following has been posted:
"Ideal Mormons" and "Deep Friendships":

The first two lessons, which we learned early in our efforts to be good member missionaries, have made sharing the gospel much easier: We simply can’t predict who will or won’t be interested in the gospel, and building a friendship is not a prerequisite to inviting people to learn about the gospel. We discovered these principles when we were newlyweds and the missionaries in our ward asked us to make a list of people with whom we could share the gospel. We were to start with those at the top of our list and begin “preparing” them through a twelve-step process. First, we were to invite them to our home for dinner and follow that by going to a cultural event together. The sixth, seventh, and eighth steps were to invite them to church, give them a copy of the Book of Mormon, and ask them to take the missionary discussions. The program culminated in the twelfth step—baptism.

We dutifully made this list, placing those we thought most likely to be interested in the gospel at the top. They looked like “ideal Mormons”—people whose values, such as clean living and commitment to family, mirrored our own. We then began building deeper friendships with them, adding additional social events to our already busy lives. One by one, those we thought might be interested in learning about the gospel declined our invitations when we got to steps six through eight. Our invitations didn’t offend them, but in their own way they told us they were happy in their present approach to religion. After much work over many months, we didn’t find anyone who was interested in learning more about the gospel.
Every member of the Mormon church is a missionary, regardless of their age. The church actually publishes this kind of thinking that it wants it's members to obey. Friendships to Mormons are not based on genuine things such as love, trust, faith and companionship. Mormon relationships are based upon converting any person who is not yet a member of their church.

And Mormons wonder why so many people can see right through them.

Reference Here.
 
 

static top

BLOGS:

  • February Ensign: Dead Sea Scrolls "Prove" Smith And Show A Lost Ancient LDS Community?

  • God Loves Clam Chowder More Than Anything!

  • The December 2005 Ensign First Presidency Message, Written By President Hinckley, Is Essentially A Repeat Of An April 1977 General Conference Address.

  • December 2005 Ensign-- "Merry Smithmas!" Are You Kidding Me!?

  • Subliminal Tithing Message In This Months Ensign?

  • The Life Of Bathsheba Smith (Abridged)

  • July Ensign Article Encourages Members To Contact Those On "Do Not Contact" List

  • Cover Story On The June Ensign: Strengthening Future Mothers

  • General Conference Report - I Have Seen A Sign

  • Is The Ensign The Most Boring Church Magazine In All Religiondom?

  • More White Washed Mormon History - Ensign May 2005

  • My "sin"-born Baby More Likely To Die Of SIDS: Thanks Ensign

  • Why Mormons Can't Just Be "friends"







  • The MormonCurtain.COM
    The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily
    reflect the positions of Infymus (aka Michael S. Hoenie) or FASTERPING.
    Articles posted here are copyrighted (c) by their respective owners.

    Hosted by FASTERPING
    Compiled by Caligra 1.09 | 13 Jan 2006